Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alonzo, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Alonzo, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 1: 105-111
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

A trade-off generated by sexual conflict: Mediterranean wrasse males refuse present mates to increase future success

Suzanne Henson Alonzo and Robert R. Warner

Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 83106, USA

Address correspondence to S. Henson Alonzo, Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. E-mail: shalonzo{at}cats.ucsc.edu.

A variety of mechanisms, including intrasexual competition, intersexual conflict, and physiological constraints, can explain patterns of reproduction and the adaptive value of specific behaviors. In a Mediterranean wrasse, Symphodus ocellatus (Labridae), large, nesting males occasionally refuse to spawn with willing females in the presence of small, sneaker males. We explored the possible adaptive significance of this behavior. Nesting males refuse females despite the fact that it reduces their immediate mating success. This nesting-male behavior also decreases female and sneaker mating success and occurs when sneaker males surround the nest. Experiments that decreased the number of sneakers around nests showed that nesting males respond immediately to mating opportunities when fewer sneakers are present, and thus they are not simply constrained by a lack of energy or lack of sperm. Experiments that increased the number of sneakers at the nest caused nesting males initially to refuse spawning opportunities, followed by a subsequent decrease in sneaker presence and an increase in mating rate. We propose that this behavior is the result of a trade-off between immediate mating success and future reproduction created by competition between males and conflict between the sexes. Males reduce their immediate mating success by reducing spawning at the nest; sneaker males subsequently leave, and this decreases mate competition for the nesting male. Unresponsiveness of nesting males also causes sexual conflict between females and nesting males over mating. We argue that this behavior and the existence of a trade-off can only be understood by examining intersexual conflict and intrasexual competition simultaneously.

Key words: mating systems, Mediterranean wrasse, reproductive behavior, reproductive trade-off, sexual conflict, Symphodus ocellatus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
I. M. Hamilton, M. P. Haesler, and M. Taborsky
Predators, reproductive parasites, and the persistence of poor males on leks
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
O. Svensson and C. Kvarnemo
The importance of sperm competition risk and nest appearance for male behavior and female choice in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 1042 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. H. Alonzo
Uncertainty in territory quality affects the benefits of usurpation in a Mediterranean wrasse
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 278 - 285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.