Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 1: 54-62
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills
Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001, USA
Address correspondence to C. W. Benkman, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001. E-mail:cbenkman{at}nmsu.edu.
Group foragers may assess patch quality more efficiently by paying attention to the sampling behavior of group members foraging in the same patch (i.e., using "public information"). To determine whether red crossbills (Loxia curvirostra) use public information to aid their patch departure decisions, we conducted experiments that compared the sampling behavior of crossbills foraging on a two-patch system (one patch was always empty, one patch containing seeds) when alone, in pairs, and in flocks of three. When foraging alone, crossbills departed from empty patches in a way that was qualitatively consistent with energy maximization. We found evidence for the use of public information when crossbills were paired with two flock mates, but not when paired with one flock mate. When foraging with two flock mates, crossbills sampled approximately half the number of cones on the empty patch before departing as compared to when solitary. Furthermore, as expected if public information is used, the variance in both the number of cones and time spent on the empty patch decreased when crossbills foraged with two flock mates as compared to when alone. Although high frequencies of scrounging reduce the availability of public information, scrounging is usually uncommon in crossbills, apparently because they exploit divisible patches. Consequently, public information is likely to be important to crossbills in the wild. We also show that feeding performance is greatly diminished when the feeding performances of flock mates differ. This provides a mechanism that will favor assortative grouping by phenotype when phenotypes affect feeding performance, which may in turn promote speciation in some groups of animals.
Key words: assortative flocking, crossbills, feeding performance, flocking, foraging behavior, Loxia curvirostra, optimal patch sampling, public information, speciation.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. W. Clark Public information for solitary foragers: timber rattlesnakes use conspecific chemical cues to select ambush sites Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 487 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Shrader, G. I.H. Kerley, B. P. Kotler, and J. S. Brown Social information, social feeding, and competition in group-living goats (Capra hircus) Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 103 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Coolen, A. J.W. Ward, P. J.B. Hart, and K. N. Laland Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 865 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Danchin, L.-A. Giraldeau, T. J. Valone, and R. H. Wagner Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution Science, July 23, 2004; 305(5683): 487 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Fernandez-Juricic, S. Siller, and A. Kacelnik Flock density, social foraging, and scanning: an experiment with starlings Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 371 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Kendal, I. Coolen, and K. N. Laland The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 269 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Smith, G. D. Ruxton, and W. Cresswell Dominance and feeding interference in small groups of blackbirds Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 475 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|