Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rooney, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 1: 97-104
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Differential allocation of male-derived nutrients in two lampyrid beetles with contrasting life-history characteristics

Jennifer Rooney and Sara M. Lewis

Department of Biology, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA

Address correspondence to J. R. Rooney. E-mailjrooney{at}tufts.edu.

Across diverse animal taxa, sperm is transferred from males to females during mating within a spermatophore produced by male accessory glands. In some insects, male spermatophores provide females with nutrients that may be used to increase reproductive output or for somatic maintenance, while in others no such benefits have been detected. Boggs suggested that variation in the current function of spermatophores may be explained by considering ecological and life-history factors. This study examined spermatophore function in Ellychnia corrusca and Photinus ignitus (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), two beetles that exhibit marked differences in adult diet, adult life span, and overwintering stage. During mating, males of both species transfer to females a complex, proteinaceous spermatophore, which is subsequently digested in a specialized sac within the female reproductive tract. Males of each species were injected with 3H-radiolabeled amino acid mixtures and mated with conspecific females. The fate of spermatophore-derived proteins was determined by dissecting females at various times after mating with these radiolabeled males. Females of these two species showed markedly different patterns of incorporation of spermatophorederived nutrients. P. ignitus females incorporated the majority (62%) of spermatophore-derived protein into maturing oocytes within 2 days after mating. In contrast, in E. corrusca a large percentage of radiolabel (46%) appeared in female fat body at 6 days after mating, with a threefold lower allocation to maturing oocytes compared to P. ignitus. These findings support the prediction that short-lived, nonfeeding females are selected to allocate a greater proportion of male-derived nutrients to reproduction, while longer-lived, feeding females are selected to allocate a greater proportion to somatic reserves and maintenance. These results suggest that life-history characteristics may be useful in explaining observed differences in spermatophore function across taxa.

Key words: Ellychnia, firefly, life history, nuptial gifts, paternal investment, Photinus, radiotracer, spermatophore.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
S. M. Lewis, C. K. Cratsley, and J. A. Rooney
Nuptial Gifts and Sexual Selection in Photinus Fireflies
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 44(3): 234 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
C. K. Cratsley
Flash Signals, Nuptial Gifts and Female Preference in Photinus Fireflies
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2004; 44(3): 238 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. K. Cratsley and S. M. Lewis
Female preference for male courtship flashes in Photinus ignitus fireflies
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 135 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.