Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasquet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lubin, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pasquet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lubin, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 2: 115-121
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Previous foraging success influences web building in the spider Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae)

Alain Pasqueta, Raymond Leborgnea and Yael Lubinb

a Laboratoire de Biologie et Physiologie du Comportement, URA CNRS n°1293, UHP Nancy 1, B.P. 239, 54506 Vandoeuvre les Nancy Cedex, France, b Mitrani Center for Desert Ecology, Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben Gurion University, Sede Boker Campus, 84993 Israel

Address correspondence to A. Pasquet. E-mail: pasquet{at}scbiol.u-nancy.fr

Stegodyphus lineatus (Eresidae) is a desert spider that builds an aerial capture web on bushes in the Negev desert in southern Israel. Web building for spiders is costly in energy, time, and risk of predation. Spiders should trade-off these costs with the benefits in terms of prey capture. We tested the hypothesis that the previous foraging success of the spider influences the effort invested in foraging. Specifically, we asked whether an increase in food intake causes spiders to reduce web renewal activity and web size. Alternatively, time constraints on foraging and development, resulting from a short growing season, could induce spiders to continue foraging even when supplemented with prey. The cost of web building was measured as time and mass loss. To build an average size web (about 150 cm2), we calculated that a spider requires 6 h and that spiders lose 3%-7% of their weight. In field experiments, spiders responded differently to food supplementation in 2 different years. In 1994, they improved their condition compared to individuals whose webs were removed to reduce foraging opportunities and compared to control spiders. In 1995, spiders tested earlier in the season than the previous year did not improve their condition in response to prey supplementation. Nonetheless, in both years, food-supplemented spiders built significantly smaller webs than food-deprived and control spiders. This result was confirmed in a laboratory experiment where prey intake was controlled. We conclude that for S. lineatus immediate foraging risks outweigh the potential time constraints on foraging.

Key words: Eresidae, food supplementation, optimal foraging, spiders, Stegodyphus lineatus, web building.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.