Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greeff, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Greeff, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 2: 141-148
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Cooperative breeding, offspring packaging, and biased sex ratios in allodapine bees

Jaco M. Greeff

Arbeitsgruppe Michiels, Max-Planck-Institute for Behavioral Physiology (Seewiesen), PO Box 1564, D-82305 Starnberg, Germany, and Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa

Address correspondence to J. M. Greef, Department of Zoological Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa. E-mail: greeff{at}mpi-seeviesen.mpg.de

It is not generally appreciated that positive kin interactions do not necessarily result in an evolutionarily stable (ES) skewed sex ratio. Stability depends critically on the sex of both the helper and receiver. When help is given within one sex only, no monomorphic ES strategy exists, and local resource enhancement (LRE) between offspring of one sex does not predict a sex ratio bias toward that sex. I developed a model to clarify and examine the sex ratio biases that may be expected under cooperative breeding. I found that LRE between cooperatively breeding female allodapine bees cannot explain their female-biased sex ratios. Allodapine females feed and protect brothers, which may stabilize the female-biased sex ratio, but the model shows this is not the case because benevolence to males is likely to decrease rapidly as the number of females increases. For small broods this helping behavior causes a female bias, but bigger broods could be sufficiently male biased to compensate the population sex ratio. Considering the fact that females need to be packaged into reproductive units (multifemale colonies), of which intermediate-sized units are the most productive, it is shown that fitness returns from females are in fact a wavelike function. This results in a rugged fitness landscape, which could explain the female-biased population sex ratios of allodapine bees as an adaptation to local fitness peaks rather than a global optimum. In behaviors where organisms have to package limited resources into integer numbers of units, the possible solutions are limited, and careful analysis is required.

Key words: allodapine bees, class structured groups, cooperative breeding, packaging, reproductive value, sex ratio.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. P. Martins, Y. Antonini, F. A. da Silveira, and S. A. West
Seasonal variation in the sex allocation of a neotropical solitary bee
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 1999; 10(4): 401 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.