Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (71)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monnin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Monnin, T.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 3: 323-332
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Dominance hierarchy and reproductive conflicts among subordinates in a monogynous queenless ant

Thibaud Monnin and Christian Peeters

CNRS URA 667, Laboratoire d'Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée, Université Paris Nord, 93430 Villetaneuse, France

Address correspondence to C. Peeters, who is now at CNRS UMR 7625, Laboratoire d'Ecologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 quai Saint Bernard, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: cpeeters{at}snv.jussieu.fr

In insect societies lacking morphologically specialized breeders and helpers, reproduction is often restricted to behaviorally dominant individuals. Such societies occur in about 100 species of ants that have secondarily lost the queen caste. All females, who are morphologically workers, can potentially mate and lay eggs but only a few do so, and we demonstrate in Dinoponera quadriceps that this is regulated by a dominance hierarchy. Six types of agonistic interactions allowed the ranking of 5-10 workers in the hierarchy (n = 15 colonies). In particular, alpha and beta had characteristic behavioral profiles and were easily recognized. Only alpha mated, and workers ranking beta to delta sometimes produced unfertilized, male-destined eggs. Natural replacements (n = 19) and experimental removals (n = 15) of alpha demonstrated that beta was the individual most likely to replace alpha, although gamma and more rarely delta sometimes did, and we discuss the conflict that occurs among high-ranking individuals over who should replace alpha. After such replacements, the new alpha behaved more aggressively than the overthrown alpha. Newly emerged workers tended to reach high ranks and displaced older high-ranking individuals down the hierarchy. Low-ranking subordinates often prevented high-ranking individuals from replacing alpha by biting and holding their appendages (worker policing), which is consistent with the pattern of relatedness associated with monogyny and monandry in D. quadriceps. We investigated the relative importance of chemical communication and dominance interactions to regulate reproduction. Alpha, beta, and sterile workers have different signatures of cuticular hydrocarbons, and these may provide honest information which underpins worker policing by low-ranking individuals.

Key words: dominance, gamergate, hierarchy, Ponerinae, pheromone, relatedness, reproduction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Cant and S. English
Stable group size in cooperative breeders: the role of inheritance and reproductive skew
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 560 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Beekman, C. Peeters, and M. J. O'Riain
Developmental divergence: neglected variable in understanding the evolution of reproductive skew in social animals
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 622 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Cant and J. Field
Helping effort in a dominance hierarchy
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 708 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. Anderson and N. R. Franks
Teams in animal societies
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2001; 12(5): 534 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.