Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martins, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by West, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martins, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by West, S. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 4: 401-408
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Seasonal variation in the sex allocation of a neotropical solitary bee

Rogerio P. Martinsa, Yasmine Antoninia, Fernando A. da Silveirab and Stuart A. Westc

a Departmento Biologia Geral, ICB-UFMG, Cx. Postal 486, 30161-900, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil b Departmento Zoologia, ICB-UFMG, Cx. Postal 486, 30161-900, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil c Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK

Address correspondence to S. A. West. E-mail: Stu.West{at}ed.ac.uk

We carried out a field study on the life history and sex allocation of the ground-nesting solitary bee Diadasina distincta (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae). This species is multivoltine, undergoing five generations a year between February and September. The numerical sex ratio of this species was female biased overall (approximately 38% males) and showed a strong and consistent seasonal pattern. The numerical sex ratio was extremely female biased (approximately 20% males) from February until May, and then slightly male biased (approximately 60% males) from June until September. Females were 3.26 times the size of males, and so the overall investment ratio was female biased throughout the year. The overall female bias and seasonal variation in sex allocation is unlikely to be explained by models that invoke overlapping generations or competition between brothers for mates (local mate competition). We suggest that a possible explanation for the female bias in the early part of the season is local resource enhancement (LRE): nesting near larger numbers of sisters reduces parasitism. LRE is likely to decrease in importance in the later part of the season, when the biased numerical and investment ratios may be explained by models in which male and female offspring gain different fitness returns from resources invested.

Key words: bees, Diadasina distincta, eusociality, local resource enhancement, sex ratio, variance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.