Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hackländer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hackländer, K.
Right arrow Articles by Arnold, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 5: 592-597
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Male-caused failure of female reproduction and its adaptive value in alpine marmots (Marmota marmota)

Klaus Hackländer and Walter Arnold

Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Savoyenstr. 1, A-1160 Vienna, Austria

Address correspondence to K. Hackländer. E-mail: Klaus.Hacklaender{at}vu-wien.ac.at .

We studied reproductive performance of free-living alpine marmots (Marmota marmota) for 14 years in the National Park of Berchtesgaden, Germany. Female reproduction was influenced by body condition and social factors. Reproduction depleted fat reserves, and only females emerging from hibernation with sufficient body mass were able to reproduce successfully. Marmots lived in social groups in territories defended by a dominant male and female. Subordinate females never reproduced, regardless of body mass. Territory takeovers by males impaired reproduction of dominant females, but only if the takeover occurred after the mating period. Reproductive failures occurred despite clear signs of pregnancy such enlarged nipples or late molt. Decreasing progesterone levels after the mating period and the lack of evidence for direct infanticide by new territorial males suggest a block of pregnancy as a likely explanation for reproductive failures in groups with male takeovers during gestation. Rendering female reproduction impossible increased future reproductive success of new territory owners. Nonparous females saved the energetic cost of maternal investment and thus emerged with higher body mass in the following spring. In line with this, females failing to wean young had higher reproductive success in the subsequent year.

Key words: Bruce effect, females, infanticide, Marmota marmota, marmots, reproductive failure, reproductive suppression.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
J. G. Boyles, M. B. Dunbar, J. J. Storm, and V. Brack Jr
Energy availability influences microclimate selection of hibernating bats
J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2007; 210(24): 4345 - 4350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. Allaine and F. Theuriau
Is there an optimal number of helpers in Alpine marmot family groups?
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2004; 15(6): 916 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. Allaine
Sex ratio variation in the cooperatively breeding alpine marmot Marmota marmota
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2004; 15(6): 997 - 1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.