Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weatherhead, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Weatherhead, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Eckert, C. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 6: 619-625
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

A test of the good-genes-as-heterozygosity hypothesis using red-winged blackbirds

Patrick J. Weatherheada, Kevin W. Dufoura, Stephen C. Lougheedb and Christopher G. Eckertb

a Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada b Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada

Address correspondence to P. J. Weatherhead. E-mail: pweather{at}biology.queensu.ca .

Brown recently proposed that the "good genes" that females pursue when choosing mates may be individual heterozygosity because more heterozygous mates sire offspring with higher fitness. Further, because heterozygosity might enhance developmental stability, males with more heterozygosity are recognized by the reduced fluctuating asymmetry (FA) of their bilaterally paired traits. We used a point sample of 67 male red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) to test two predictions of this hypothesis: (1) males with more heterozygosity have higher fitness, and (2) males with more heterozygosity have lower FA. We identified 7 polymorphic loci from an initial screening of 16 enzymes; 32 individuals were completely homozygous, and 35 individuals were heterozygous at at least 1 locus. Larger and older males realized higher mating success in this population, but neither size nor age was related to heterozygosity. Heterozygous males were not in better condition than homozygous males, nor were they less infected by hematozoa, lice, or mites. Among 1-year old males, epaulet length did not differ between homozygotes and heterozygotes, but among older males, heterozygotes did have longer epaulets. Homozygotes and heterozygotes did not differ in their mean FA scores for nine individual characters. Although the two groups of males did differ in composite FA, heterozygous males were less symmetrical. Interestingly, this difference was attributable to a single allele at the PGM-3 locus. Combined with previous results showing that FA was generally unrelated to male health, viability, parental care, social dominance, or mating success, the present results indicate that Brown's hypothesis does not explain mate choice or male quality in this population of red-winged blackbirds.

Key words: fitness, fluctuating asymmetry, good genes, heterozygosity, isozymes, red-winged blackbirds.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
V. Garcia-Navas, J. Ortego, and J. J. Sanz
Heterozygosity-based assortative mating in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): implications for the evolution of mate choice
Proc R Soc B, August 22, 2009; 276(1669): 2931 - 2940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
W. U. Blanckenhorn and D. J. Hosken
Heritability of three condition surrogates in the yellow dung fly
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2003; 14(5): 612 - 618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.