Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrison, J. S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gass, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Garrison, J. S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gass, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 10 No. 6: 714-725
© 1999 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Response of a traplining hummingbird to changes in nectar availability

Jennifer S. E. Garrison and Clifton Lee Gass

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

Address correspondence to J. S. E. Garrison, Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii, 2538 The Mall, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. E-mail: garrison{at}hawaii.edu .

Theory predicts that nectarivores respond to changes in profitability of patches of flowers or feeders by adjusting visitation rate to increase reward size. We conducted a set of experiments in an outdoor enclosure with seven feeders to determine how Phaethornis longirostris, a traplining hummingbird, adjusts its visitation rates in response to changes in sucrose solution delivery rates. Each experiment tested the response of P. longirostris to the following changes in the timing and volume of sucrose solution delivery: (1) increases in sucrose solution abundance at all feeders (mimicking seasonal increases in numbers of open flowers or nectar output); (2) large changes in sucrose solution availability at one feeder (mimicking increases or decreases of patch profitability); and (3) sudden unexpected decreases in sucrose solution availability at one feeder (mimicking loss of nectar to competitors). We found that P. longirostris (1) decreased visitation rates when the sucrose solution delivery rate was higher at all feeders, (2) increased visitation rates to individual feeders when their profitability increased for whole days but did not significantly decrease visitation rates when feeder output decreased; and (3) responded to sudden food losses at a feeder (due to simulated competition) by increasing use of that feeder for 1 or 2 h after the loss.

Key words: foraging behavior, hummingbirds, nectarivore, Phaethornis longirostris, Phaethornis superciliosus, trapline.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Ohashi, A. Leslie, and J. D. Thomson
Trapline foraging by bumble bees: V. Effects of experience and priority on competitive performance
Behav. Ecol., May 30, 2008; (2008) arn048v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Ohashi, J. D. Thomson, and D. D'Souza
Trapline foraging by bumble bees: IV. Optimization of route geometry in the absence of competition
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Ohashi and J. D. Thomson
Efficient harvesting of renewing resources
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 592 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.