Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dolby, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grubb, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dolby, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Grubb, T. C., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 1: 110-114
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Social context affects risk taking by a satellite species in a mixed-species foraging group

Andrew S. Dolby and Thomas C. Grubb, Jr.

Behavioral Ecology Group, Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, 1735 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1293, USA

Address correspondence to A. S. Dolby, Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA. E-mail: dolby{at}chumal.cas.usf.edu .

Mixed-species flocks of birds form during winter in the eastern deciduous forests of North America. These flocks consist of two flock-leading nuclear species, tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor) and Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis), and several follower, or satellite, species, including downy woodpecker (Picoides pubescens) and white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta carolinensis). Hypotheses explaining the adaptiveness of participation in such mixed-species foraging groups have focused on increased foraging success and/or decreased predation risk. We tested the prediction that if nuthatches join nuclear species to reduce predation risk, they should be more reluctant to visit an exposed feeder in the absence of titmice than in their presence. When the feeder was positioned 16 m from forest cover, latency to visit the feeder was greater for both male and female nuthatches when titmice were absent. Removal of titmice had no effect on latency at 8 m. In the absence of titmice, nuthatches visited the feeder less frequently at both distances. These results indicate that reduced predation risk is a benefit that satellite species gain by flocking with nuclear species.

Key words: Baeolophus bicolor, group foraging, mixed-species group, predation, Sitta carolinensis, social behavior, tufted titmouse, white-breasted nuthatch.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
M.M Webster, A.J.W Ward, and P.J.B Hart
Shoal and prey patch choice by co-occurring fishes and prawns: inter-taxa use of socially transmitted cues
Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2008; 275(1631): 203 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
E. V. Pravosudova and T. C. Grubb Jr.
An experimental test of the prolonged brood care model in the tufted titmouse (Baeolophus bicolor)
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2000; 11(3): 309 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.