Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burd, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burd, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 2: 125-131
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Body size effects on locomotion and load carriage in the highly polymorphic leaf-cutting ants Atta colombica and Atta cephalotes

Martin Burd

Department of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton 3800, Victoria, Australia

Address correspondence to M. Burd. E-mail: martin.burd{at}sci. monash.edu.au .

Leaf-cutting ants reduce their walking speed under the weight of the leaf fragments they carry, an effect likely to have some consequence for the foraging performance of a colony. I manipulated loads carried by workers from two Atta species to determine how load mass and body size affect walking speed. A comparison of speeds before and after load manipulation indicates that change in load mass has a linear effect on velocity. Several different regression models of speed as a function of loads and body size have similar fit to the data, so a single best model cannot easily be identified. However, there is statistical evidence that the slope of the linear effect is more pronounced for smaller ants, an outcome most consistent with a regression model based on loading ratio, a metric that scales load mass relative to body mass. I then examined the effect of loading ratio on the leaf transport rate (the product of load mass and carriage velocity). It has been claimed that this rate is maximized over a range of loading ratios that is the same for all ants regardless of their size. However, I found that a latent body mass effect persists in the relation of transport rate to loading ratio, even though loading ratio is already scaled relative to body mass. The maxima seem to be reached only at artificially elevated loading ratios, so that transport rates with natural fragments tend to be sub-maximal. This conclusion is in agreement with analytical predictions of rate-maximizing load masses derived from the regression models. Thus, loading ratio does not adequately scale load mass relative to body size when used in this context (effect on leaf transport rate), and should be used cautiously. Ants are likely to accommodate loads through modulation of both stride length and step frequency, but precisely how this takes place requires future study.

Key words: ants, Atta, central place foraging, Formicidae, walking speed, scaling.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol LettHome page
M. Burd and J. J Howard
Optimality in a partitioned task performed by social insects
Biol Lett, December 23, 2008; 4(6): 627 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
O. T. Lewis, M. Martin, and T. J. Czaczkes
Effects of trail gradient on leaf tissue transport and load size selection in leaf-cutter ants
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2008; 19(4): 805 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
H. Helantera and F. L.W Ratnieks
Geometry explains the benefits of division of labour in a leafcutter ant
Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2008; 275(1640): 1255 - 1260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.