Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bee, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Owen, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bee, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Owen, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 2: 169-177
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Male green frogs lower the pitch of acoustic signals in defense of territories: a possible dishonest signal of size?

Mark A. Beea, Stephen A. Perrillb and Patrick C. Owenb

a Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA b Department of Biological Sciences, Butler University, Indianapolis, IN 46208, USA

Address correspondence to M. A. Bee, 105 Tucker Hall, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211-7400, USA. E-mail: c669112{at}showme.missouri.edu .

In responses to broadcasts of conspecific advertisement calls, male green frogs (Rana clamitans) lower the dominant frequency of their calls. Because dominant frequency is negatively correlated with male body size in green frogs, frequency alteration provides a means of potentially exaggerating size during territorial contests. In field playback experiments, we broadcast synthetic stimuli representing small, medium, or large intruders to territorial residents. We tested the hypotheses that males use frequency alteration to provide honest signals of their size or their size-independent fighting ability, or to dishonestly signal size. Dominant frequency did not better predict male size in response calls than in unsolicited calls. The magnitude of frequency alteration was not related to body size, general condition, or an indirect measure of fighting ability. Thus, males did not use frequency alteration to provide honest information about body size or size-independent fighting ability. However, males significantly increased their apparent size by producing lower frequency calls. Small males produced relatively lower frequency calls in response to the large-male stimulus (compared to the small-male and medium-male stimuli), but large males did not. Further, the magnitudes of frequency alteration were significantly greater in responses to the large-male stimulus, primarily because small males responded with a greater decrease in frequency to the large-male stimulus than to the small-male and medium-male stimuli. These results support several predictions of the dishonest signal hypothesis and suggest that dishonesty may be a conditional strategy used by small males.

Key words: bluffing, dishonesty, frequency alteration, green frogs, Rana clamitans, territoriality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Bee
Territorial male bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) do not assess fighting ability based on size-related variation in acoustic signals
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 109 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.