Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 3: 294-298
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Is variation in brood sex ratios adaptive in the great tit (Parus major)?
Edward Grey Institute of Field Ornithology, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
Address correspondence to A. N. Radford at the Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. E-mail: ar255{at}hermes.cam.ac.uk .
Life-history theory predicts skewed offspring sex ratios in a range of situations in which the costs and benefits of producing the two sexes differ. In recent years, many studies have demonstrated biased sex ratios in a variety of bird species. However, many of these investigations have been based on small sample sizes, on data from a single year, or both. Using a recently developed polymerase chain reaction-based molecular DNA technique, 912 great tit (Parus major) nestlings from 118 broods in 5 different years were sexed. As found in a number of previous studies on the same species, there were significant predictors of offspring sex ratio in individual years. However, there were no consistent trends across years, and none of the measured variables significantly predicted sex ratio over all years combined. Furthermore, brood sex ratio of the population did not depart from the expected binomial distribution. Although there are theoretical advantages to manipulating the sex ratio in this and other species, the physiological mechanism by which it is achieved in birds remains obscure. We argue that data from several years are needed to confirm whether facultative sex ratio manipulation is a consistent breeding strategy used by birds.
Key words: great tits, molecular sexing, Parus major, sex ratios.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. E. Delmore, O. Kleven, T. Laskemoen, S. A. Crowe, J. T. Lifjeld, and R. J. Robertson Sex allocation and parental quality in tree swallows Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1243 - 1249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Korsten, C. M. Lessells, A. C. Mateman, M. van der Velde, and J. Komdeur Primary sex ratio adjustment to experimentally reduced male UV attractiveness in blue tits Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 539 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A Whittingham, P. O Dunn, and J. K Nooker Maternal influences on brood sex ratios: an experimental study in tree swallows Proc R Soc B, September 7, 2005; 272(1574): 1775 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.N. Rutstein, H.E. Gorman, K.E. Arnold, L. Gilbert, K.J. Orr, A. Adam, R. Nager, and J.A. Graves Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in the zebra finch Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 763 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. E. Budden and S. R. Beissinger Against the odds? Nestling sex ratio variation in green-rumped parrotlets Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 607 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. R. Oddie and C. Reim Egg sex ratio and paternal traits: using within-individual comparisons Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 503 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. I. Leech, I. R. Hartley, I. R. K. Stewart, S. C. Griffith, and T. Burke No effect of parental quality or extrapair paternity on brood sex ratio in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2001; 12(6): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|