Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (54)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brashares, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Arcese, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brashares, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Arcese, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 4: 452-463
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Phylogenetic analysis of coadaptation in behavior, diet, and body size in the African antelope

Justin S. Brasharesa, Theodore Garland, Jr.b and Peter Arcesea

a Department of Wildlife Ecology b Department of Zoology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA

Address correspondence to J. S. Brashares, Centre for Applied Conservation Biology, University of British Columbia, 3041 Forest Sciences Centre, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. E-mail : justinb{at}interchange.ubc.ca .

Several authors have suggested that African antelope (family Bovidae) exemplify coadaptation of ecological, behavioral, and morphological traits. We tested four hypotheses related to the ecology and behavior of 75 species of African antelope using both conventional statistical techniques and techniques that account for the nonindependence of species by considering their phylogenetic relationships. Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that (1) dietary selectivity is correlated negatively with body mass, (2) dietary selectivity is correlated negatively with group size, (3) gregarious species either flee or counterattack when approached by predators, but solitary and pair-living species seek cover to hide, and (4) body mass and group size are correlated positively. Each of these hypotheses was examined for the global data set (family Bovidae) and, when possible, within the two antelope subfamilies (Antilopinae and Bovinae) and within 7 of the 10 antelope tribes. The results of our conventional and phylogenetically corrected analyses supported the hypotheses that group and body size vary predictably with feeding style and that antipredator behavior varies with group size. The hypothesis that body mass and group size are correlated positively was supported by conventional statistics, but these two traits were only weakly related using a phylogenetically corrected analysis. Moreover, qualitative and quantitative comparisons within each of the eight major African antelope tribes generally gave little support for the four hypotheses tested. Thus, although our analyses at the subfamily level provided results that were consistent with prior hypotheses, our analyses at the level of tribes were equivocal. We discuss several possible explanations for these differences.

Key words: African antelope, antipredator behavior, Bovidae, behavioral ecology, coadaptation, diet, group size, independent contrast, phylogenetic constraint, phylogeny.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. B. Buchwalter, D. J. Cain, C. A. Martin, L. Xie, S. N. Luoma, and T. Garland Jr
From the Cover: Aquatic insect ecophysiological traits reveal phylogenetically based differences in dissolved cadmium susceptibility
PNAS, June 17, 2008; 105(24): 8321 - 8326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J MOLLUS STUDHome page
C. L. Huffard
Ethogram of Abdopus aculeatus (d'Orbigny, 1834) (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae): can behavioural characters inform octopodid taxomony and systematics?
J. Mollus. Stud., July 5, 2007; (2007) eym015v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. A. Ebensperger and D. T. Blumstein
Sociality in New World hystricognath rodents is linked to predators and burrow digging
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 410 - 418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
V. O. Ezenwa
Host social behavior and parasitic infection: a multifactorial approach
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 446 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. J. Stoner, T. M. Caro, and C. M. Graham
Ecological and behavioral correlates of coloration in artiodactyls: systematic analyses of conventional hypotheses
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 823 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. A. Ebensperger and H. Cofre
On the evolution of group-living in the New World cursorial hystricognath rodents
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2001; 12(2): 227 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.