Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmair, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Korb, J.
Right arrow Articles by Linsenmair, K. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 5: 486-494
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Ventilation of termite mounds: new results require a new model

Judith Korb and Karl Eduard Linsenmair

Theodor Boveri Institut, Lehrstuhl für Tierökologie und Tropenbiologie, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany

Address correspondence to J. Korb at CSIRO, Entomology, GPO Box 1700, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia. E-mail: judith.korb{at}ento.csiro.au .

In 1955, Lüscher proposed a ventilation mechanism for cathedral-shaped termite mounds to exchange respiratory gases. This mechanism was generally accepted, although it had never been tested critically. We tested this mechanism by investigating temperatures, CO2 concentrations, and air currents in and around two types of Macrotermes bellicosus mounds: cathedral-shaped mounds with many ridges and thin walls located in the savanna and dome-shaped mounds without ridges and with thick walls in the forest. These two mound shapes have two different mechanisms of ventilation, depending on the environmental temperature. In the savanna during the day, sun heats the air in the peripheral air channels inside the ridges of the mound above the central nest temperatures and produces a temperature gradient in the peripheral air channels with decreased temperatures at the top of the mound. This temperature gradient leads to convection currents with air rising inside the air channels of the ridges to the top of the mound, meanwhile exchanging CO2. In contrast, in the savanna during the night and generally in the forest, the temperatures inside the air channels are lower than those of the central nest, and no air currents rising upward inside the air channels were detected. The CO2 concentrations in the air channels of savanna mounds at night and forest mounds in general were higher than during the day in the savanna. Therefore, our data do not support Lüscher's proposed mechanism.

Key words: carbon dioxide, gas exchange, Ivory Coast, Macrotermes bellicosus, metabolism, termite mounds, thermoregulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.