Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Herbers, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stuart, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Herbers, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 6: 676-685
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Nest mate recognition in ants with complex colonies: within- and between-population variation

Robin J. Stuart and Joan M. Herbers

Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

Address correspondence to J. M. Herbers, who is now at the Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail: herbers{at}lamar.colostate.edu .

The ability to recognize kin is widespread, and especially important in highly social organisms. We studied kin recognition by assessing patterns of aggression within and between nests of the ant Leptothorax longispinosus. Colonies of this species can be fractionated into subunits, a condition called polydomy. The problem of recognizing relatives is therefore more complex when those relatives can live in two or more different places. We hypothesized that spatial subdivision may have resulted in a stronger genetic component to kin recognition than in cases where colonies live in a single location. To test our hypothesis we assessed recognition capabilities for two populations of this ant that differ in the complexity of their colonies. In a New York, USA, population, polydomy is very common, and colonies also can have multiple queens. By contrast, a population in West Virginia, USA, has colonies that typically are monogynous and rarely are polydomous. We conducted introductions of ants between different nests collected in the same neighborhood, with self-introductions and alien introductions as controls. Nests from the two populations showed corresponding differences in their aggression towards intruders. For New York nests, the extent of genetic similarity was the single best predictor of aggression, whereas for West Virginia nests aggression was jointly influenced by genetic similarity and spatial distance. In both populations, we found nest pairs for which aggression was nonreciprocal; these probably reflect recognition errors by one of the nests. After the ants were maintained in the laboratory for 3 months, their aggression scores rose and fewer recognition errors were made. Thus nest-mate and colony-mate recognition in this species are mediated primarily by endogenous cues (genetic similarity); the importance of exogenous cues for nest mate recognition depends on the population's social system.

Key words: nest mate recognition, social insects, ants, colony structure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. Sorvari, P. Theodora, S. Turillazzi, H. Hakkarainen, and L. Sundstrom
Food resources, chemical signaling, and nest mate recognition in the ant Formica aquilonia
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 441 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. Foitzik, B. Fischer, and J. Heinze
Arms races between social parasites and their hosts: geographic patterns of manipulation and resistance
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2003; 14(1): 80 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.