Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGlynn, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McGlynn, T. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 11 No. 6: 686-690
© 2000 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Do Lanchester's laws of combat describe competition in ants?

Terrence P. McGlynn

Department of Biology, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA

Address correspondence to T. P. McGlynn. E-mail: tmcglynn{at}acusd.edu .

Lanchester's laws are mathematical models, originally designed to model military combat, that describe battle outcomes based on the sizes of armies and the potencies of individual fighting units. The "square law" describes a scenario in which small-sized competitors may use a numerical advantage to overcome large-sized competitors in simultaneous combat. The "linear law" describes how a competitor with large-sized fighting units may use one-on-one combat to favor victory when outnumbered. Lanchester's laws have been suggested as an important regulator of interspecific competition in social insects, but without experimental support. In this study, experimental platforms were designed to invoke the conditions of both Lanchester's laws in a community of ants in lowland tropical wet forest in Costa Rica. I measured behavioral dominance at the food platforms in two separate manners: an ordinal ranking of the number of workers present, and the monopoly of the food platforms. At the platform invoking simultaneous combat, satisfying the square law, small-sized ants were more behaviorally dominant by numerical superiority. At the platform invoking one-on-one combat, satisfying the linear law, larger ants were more behaviorally dominant by monopoly. These results suggest that Lanchester's laws explain, in part, the outcome of interspecific competition in ants.

Key words: Lanchester battles, ant, fighting, competition, foraging behavior, leaf litter, Ectatomma, Pheidole, Solenopsis, Wasmannia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
E. S. Adams and M. Mesterton-Gibbons
Lanchester's attrition models and fights among social animals
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2003; 14(5): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. Portha, J.-L. Deneubourg, and C. Detrain
Self-organized asymmetries in ant foraging: a functional response to food type and colony needs
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2002; 13(6): 776 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.