Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 1: 59-64
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Female mate choice in a mating system dominated by male sexual coercion
a Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Padova, via Venezia 8, I-35135 Padova, Italy b Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Padova, via U. Bassi 58/b, I-35131 Padova, Italy
Address correspondence to A. Pilastro. E-mail: pilastro{at}civ.bio.unipd.it .
In poeciliid fishes, males can gain copulation either by courting females or through sexual coercion. In some species these two tactics coexist. However, in about half of the poeciliids, males do not display, females never cooperate during copulation and all matings are achieved by thrusting the intromittent organ toward the genital pore of apparently unaware females. In one of these species, the eastern mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki), the probability of insemination is influenced by the time females are previously deprived of males, suggesting that females exert some control over the occurrence of mating even in a system apparently dominated by sexual coercion. In the present study we investigated the tendency of female mosquitofish to approach males in relation to their reproductive status and the time they were previously deprived of males. The tendency to approach males increased in females that were previously deprived of males and in females that had recently given birth. When allowed to choose between males, male-deprived females preferred larger males and normally pigmented over melanistic males. Females preferred groups of three males over a single male, whereas the preference for three males over a group of one male and two females was only marginally significant. Collectively, these results suggest that, even when coercive mating is the only tactic adopted by males, females may be able to influence the outcome of these attempts, and thus exert some control over the paternity of their offspring.
Key words: sexual selection, female choice, sexual coercion, Gambusia holbrooki, fish, mating tactics.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Adler Sexual conflict in waterfowl: why do females resist extrapair copulations? Behav. Ecol., November 24, 2009; (2009) arp160v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. T. Kahn, B. Mautz, and M. D. Jennions Females prefer to associate with males with longer intromittent organs in mosquitofish Biol Lett, September 15, 2009; (2009) rsbl.2009.0637v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. B. M. Wong and M. McCarthy Prudent male mate choice under perceived sperm competition risk in the eastern mosquito fish Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2009; 20(2): 278 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Fernandez and M. R. Morris Mate choice for more melanin as a mechanism to maintain a functional oncogene PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13503 - 13507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. S Wilson, C. H.L Condon, and I. A Johnston Consequences of thermal acclimation for the mating behaviour and swimming performance of female mosquito fish Phil Trans R Soc B, November 29, 2007; 362(1487): 2131 - 2139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Carter and R. S. Wilson Improving sneaky-sex in a low oxygen environment: reproductive and physiological responses of male mosquito fish to chronic hypoxia J. Exp. Biol., December 15, 2006; 209(24): 4878 - 4884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R Morris, O. Rios-Cardenas, and M Scarlett Tudor Larger swordtail females prefer asymmetrical males Biol Lett, March 22, 2006; 2(1): 8 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Luttbeg Female mate assessment and choice behavior affect the frequency of alternative male mating tactics Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 239 - 247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|