Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welbergen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Welbergen, J.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 1: 8-15
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Egg discrimination in the Australian reed warbler (Acrocephalus australis): rejection response toward model and conspecific eggs depending on timing and mode of artificial parasitism

Justin Welbergena,b,c, Jan Komdeura,b, Romke Katsa and Mathew Berga

a Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia b Zoological Laboratory, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands c Department of Biology, University of Amsterdam 1098 SM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Address correspondence to J. Komdeur, Zoological Laboratory, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands. E-mail: J.komdeur{at}biol.rug.nl .

In a coevolutionary arms race between an interspecific brood parasite and its host species, both are expected to evolve adaptations and counteradaptations. We studied egg discrimination in the Australian warbler (Acrocephalus australis). This species is currently not significantly parasitized by the seven species of cuckoo for which it is a suitable host. However, experimental brood parasitism in the warbler revealed a fine tuned egg discrimination response towards non-mimetic and conspecific eggs, the first such evidence in an Australian passerine: (1) non-mimetic eggs were significantly more often rejected than conspecific eggs; (2) only non-mimetic dummy eggs were rejected selectively, whereas rejection of conspecific eggs entailed a rejection cost; (3) replacement of a host's egg with a conspecific egg during egg laying resulted in a significantly higher rejection rate than after the day of clutch completion; (4) by contrast, rejection rate after addition of a conspecific egg was independent of nest stage; (5) conspecific eggs introduced into a clutch during the egg laying period led to a significantly higher nest desertion rate and a lower egg ejection rate than after the day of clutch completion; and (6) addition of a conspecific egg led to egg ejection while egg replacement with a conspecific egg led to nest desertion. The fact that this species responds differentially toward different modes of artificial parasitism suggests that its egg discrimination has evolved to minimize the costs of rejection and parasitism. The ability to reject highly mimetic conspecific eggs may explain the current paucity of brood parasitism in this species. The significance of this for brood parasite-host coevolution is discussed.

Key words: egg discrimination, egg rejection, egg ejection, nest desertion, brood parasitism, coevolutionary arms race.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. Cruz, J. W. Prather, J. W. Wiley, and P. F. Weaver
Egg rejection behavior in a population exposed to parasitism: Village Weavers on Hispaniola
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 398 - 403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.