Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jennions, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Polakow, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jennions, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Polakow, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 1: 84-92
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

The effect of partial brood loss on male desertion in a cichlid fish: an experimental test

Michael D. Jennionsa and Daniel A. Polakowb

a Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Unit 0948, APO AA 34002 0948, USA b Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa

Address correspondence to M. D. Jennions, who is now at Division of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. E-mail: jennionm{at}naos.si.edu .

There is little experimental evidence testing whether current brood size and past brood mortality influence mate desertion. In the cichlid Aequidens coeruleopunctatus both parents initially defend offspring. In a field study, all experimental broods, irrespective of initial brood size (222.9 ± 60.4, mean ± SD), were manipulated to a size of 100 fry. Neither the duration nor investment of females in parental care differed between control and brood reduced pairs, even though care seemed costly. On average, females lost 5.1 ± 4.8% of initial weight while guarding a brood until independence. In contrast, males with experimentally reduced broods guarded fry for significantly fewer days before deserting their mate than did males from control pairs with natural-sized broods (20.5 ± 7.5 vs. 14.2 ± 6.2 days). In at least 20% of cases (n = 9/45), the deserting male immediately mated with another female. Males with experimentally reduced broods also spent less time guarding fry before deserting and attacked fewer brood predators than did males with control broods. For broods manipulated to have 100 fry, there was a significant negative relationship between the days until male desertion and the proportion of the initial brood removed. This indicates that male assessment of the future success of the current brood (hence its reproductive value) is based on past mortality and/or that there is variation among males in the expected size of future broods. Both current brood size and brood size relative to initial brood size are therefore predictors of male, but not female, parental behavior and mate desertion. Female care may be unaffected by brood reduction due to limited breeding opportunities and partial compensation for reduced male care.

Key words: brood reduction, brood size, cichlids, mate desertion, parental care, life-history trade-off, mating opportunities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Kosciuch, T. Parker, and B. Sandercock
Nest desertion by a cowbird host: an antiparasite behavior or a response to egg loss?
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 917 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.