Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 2: 150-156
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds
Department of Animal Ecology, Lund University, Ecology Building, SE-223 62 Lund, Sweden
Address correspondence to A. Hedenström. E-mail: anders.hedenstrom{at}zooekol.lu.se .
Predator and prey attack-escape performance is likely to be the outcome of an evolutionary arms race. Predatory birds are typically larger than their prey, suggesting different flight performances. We analyze three idealized attack-escape situations between predatory and prey birds: climbing flight escape, horizontal speeding, and turning and escape by diving. Generally a smaller bird will outclimb a larger predator and hence outclimbing should be a common escape strategy. However, some predators such as the Eleonora's falcon (Falco elenorae) has a very high rate of climb for its size. Prey species with an equal or higher capacity to climb fast, such as the swift Apus apus, usually adopt climbing escape when attacked by Eleonora's falcons. To analyze the outcome of the turning gambit between predator and prey we use a Howland diagram, where the relative linear top speeds and minimum turning radii of prey and predator define the escape and danger zones. Applied to the Eleonora's falcon and some potential prey species, this analysis indicates that the falcon usually wins against the example prey species; that is, the prey will be captured. Level maneuvering hunting is the most common strategy seen in Eleonora's falcons. To avoid capture via use of this strategy by a predator, the prey should be able to initiate tight turns at high linear speed, which is facilitated by a low wing loading (weight per unit of wing area). High diving speed is favored by large size. If close enough to safe cover, a prey might still opt for a vertical dive to escape in spite of lower terminal diving speed than that of the predator. On the basis of aerodynamic considerations we discuss escape flight strategies in birds in relation to morphological adaptations.
Key words: climbing flight, diving, Falco eleonorae, flight performance, Howland diagram, predation, turning gambit.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. J. van den Hout, K. J. Mathot, L. R.M. Maas, and T. Piersma Predator escape tactics in birds: linking ecology and aerodynamics Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2010; 21(1): 16 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Tobalske Biomechanics of bird flight J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2007; 210(18): 3135 - 3146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. E. Higham The integration of locomotion and prey capture in vertebrates: Morphology, behavior, and performance Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2007; 47(1): 82 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rivera, A. R. V. Rivera, E. E. Dougherty, and R. W. Blob Aquatic turning performance of painted turtles (Chrysemys picta) and functional consequences of a rigid body design J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4203 - 4213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Iriarte-Diaz Differential scaling of locomotor performance in small and large terrestrial mammals J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2002; 205(18): 2897 - 2908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


