Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ovadia, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kotler, B. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ovadia, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kotler, B. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 2: 219-226
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Harvest rates and foraging strategies in Negev Desert gerbils

Ofer Ovadiaa,b, Yaron Ziva,b, Zvika Abramskya,b, Berry Pinshowa,b and Burt P. Kotlerb

a Department of Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel b Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion, 84990 Israel

Address correspondence to O. Ovadia, who is now at Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 370 Prospect Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA. E-mail: ofer.ovadia{at}yale.edu .

We examined the foraging strategy and quantified the foraging traits of two nocturnal rodent species, Allenby's gerbil (Gerbillus allenbyi) and the greater Egyptian sand gerbil (Gerbillus pyramidum). In the laboratory, both species used two distinct foraging strategies: either they immediately consumed seeds found in a patch (seed tray); or they collected and delivered the seeds to their nest box for later consumption. Moreover, we found a transition in foraging strategy among individual G. allenbyi under laboratory conditions; they all began by consuming the seeds on the tray and, after 7 days on average, switched to the collecting strategy. By contrast, in the field both species used only one foraging strategy; they collected and delivered the seeds to their burrow or to surface caches for later consumption. Furthermore, G. allenbyi and G. pyramidum collected seeds at significantly higher rates in the field than in the laboratory because the seed encounter rates for both species were higher in the field. This suggests that in natural conditions, probably involving predation risk and competitive pressure, gerbils must respond in two ways: (1) they must choose a foraging strategy that reduces predation risk by minimizing time spent feeding outside their burrows; and (2) they must forage more efficiently. In the field, seed handling time of the larger species, G. pyramidum, was shorter than that of the smaller one, G. allenbyi. This difference may give G. pyramidum an advantage when resource levels are high and when most of a forager's time is spent handling seeds rather than searching for more seeds. Additionally, our field study showed that the seed encounter rate of G. allenbyi was higher than that of G. pyramidum. This difference may give G. allenbyi an advantage when resource levels are low and when searching occupies most of the forager's time. The different advantages that each species has over the other, under different conditions, may well be factors promoting their coexistence over a wide range of resource densities.

Key words: coexistence, encounter rate, foraging strategy, functional response, handling time, harvest rate.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.