Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krams, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Krams, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 3: 295-300
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Perch selection by singing chaffinches: a better view of surroundings and the risk of predation

Indriis Krams

Department of Sciences, Daugavpils Pedagogical University, Vienbas iela 13, LV-5400 Daugavpils, Latvia

Address correspondence to I. Krams. E-mail: krams{at}apollo.lv .

Predation risk varies among perches, and the vulnerability of singing chaffinches (Fringilla coelebs) might differ depending on where they perch in a tree. To find out how singing of the chaffinch is associated with antipredatory behavior, I studied perch selection in mature pine forest and in pine saplings, two habitats differing in the amount of cover for protection from predators. My results show that male chaffinches prefer to sing below the canopy of mature pines and in the uppermost parts of sapling pines. Although these are the canopy parts most exposed to sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) attacks, staying in open sites may be a beneficial strategy for singing chaffinches because it makes it possible to improve antipredatory vigilance. This assumption was supported by the hawk experiments. After being exposed to the sparrowhawk model, all of the singing birds selected the conspicuous perch below the canopy of mature pines. The males that perched higher in the canopy before the experiment moved to the lower canopy, whereas those males that sang below the canopy did not change their singing perch.

Key words: Fringilla coelebs, perch selection, predation risk, singing chaffinches, territorial advertisement.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. Ward, H. M. Lampe, and P. J. B. Slater
Singing is not energetically demanding for pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 477 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.