Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waite, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waite, T. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 3: 318-324
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Background context and decision making in hoarding gray jays

Thomas A. Waite

Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, and Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1293, USA

Address correspondence to T.A. Waite. E-mail: waite.1{at}osu.edu .

If decision makers assign stable fitness-related values to options, preference for the most valuable of simultaneously encountered options should be independent of background context (i.e., prior options). The tendency to choose optionx versus y should be unaffected by whether the decision maker has already been given a choice betweenx' and y' or between x'' and y''. Here, food-hoarding gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis) were given an initial choice between x' (one raisin, 0.5 m into a tube) and y' (three raisins, 0.5 m) or between x'' and y'' (both identical to x'). All subjects were then given a choice between x' (one raisin, 0.3 m) and y' (three raisins, 0.7 m). In violation of the principle of irrelevant alternatives, the "market share" ofx depended on prior options. Subjects initially exposed to context {x', y'} showed a stronger preference for x than did subjects initially exposed to {x'', y'}, which implies that the jays did not assign a fixed value to each option. Subjects that initially could obtain a large reward (y') for about the same "price" (perceived danger) as a small reward (x') apparently devalued the large reward (y) in the subsequent choice. This effect may be the joint byproduct of cognitive constraints and an adaptive tendency to use information provided by the context.

Key words: choice, cognitive constraints, context, decision making, hoarding, information processing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
N. J. Royle, J. Lindstrom, and N. B. Metcalfe
Context-dependent mate choice in relation to social composition in green swordtails Xiphophorus helleri
Behav. Ecol., June 6, 2008; (2008) arn059v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Marsh and A. Kacelnik
Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings
PNAS, March 5, 2002; 99(5): 3352 - 3355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.