Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lange, H.
Right arrow Articles by Leimar, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lange, H.
Right arrow Articles by Leimar, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 4: 375-380
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

The influence of predation risk on threat display in great tits

Henrik Lange and Olof Leimar

Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Address correspondence to H. Lange. E-mail: henrik.lange{at}zoologi.su.se .

In wintering birds, conflicts over food are often resolved by threat displays. For displays to be effective, there ought to be a cost associated with displaying. We investigated whether increased vulnerability to predators due to reduced vigilance could be such a cost. Conflicts ought then to be resolved using fewer or less intense displays in conditions of high risk. We also looked for differences between dominants and subordinates in their reaction to risk. Because there is considerable evidence that subordinate wintering birds forage in riskier places than dominants, one might expect dominants to be less successful in conflicts under high predation risk. In our experiment, nine flocks of four or five wintering male great tits were kept in outdoor aviaries. In the predation risk treatment, a stuffed pygmy owl was briefly shown before birds were allowed access to a feeder. In the control treatment the owl did not appear. The predator presentation caused a reduction in the amount of aggression shown by subordinates, whereas for dominants there was no statistically significant change. Dominants were at least as successful in subduing subordinates under high risk as under low risk. A possible interpretation is that our experiment reflected a natural foraging situation for great tits, where ephemeral resources can appear unpredictably. In such situations, dominants may need to be bold to gain priority of access even under increased risk of predation, whereas a subordinate would gain little by risking a conflict with small chances of winning.

Key words: great tit, Parus major, predation risk, threat display, social dominance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
H. Lange and O. Leimar
Social stability and daily body mass gain in great tits
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2004; 15(4): 549 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.