Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Danylchuk, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tonn, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Danylchuk, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tonn, W. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 4: 482-489
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Effects of social structure on reproductive activity in male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas)

Andy J. Danylchuk and William M. Tonn

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada

Address correspondence to A.J. Danylchuk, who is now at School for Field Studies, Center for Marine Resource Studies, 16 Broadway, Beverly, MA 01915, USA. E-mail: danylchuk{at}sfs-tci.org .

The selection of alternative reproductive phenotypes is often thought to be the result of physiological state, with small individuals forced energetically to postpone the allocation of resources to reproduction. However, for male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), we show that seasonal reproductive activity is modulated by social status. In enclosure and pond experiments, small males advanced their reproductive condition, held nesting territories, and spawned earlier in the reproductive season only when large males were absent or removed from the population. Since differences in the timing of reproduction among small males were not size- or condition-dependent, the common explanation for the selection of alternative reproductive phenotypes, based on state-dependence, is insufficient. In the absence of large, socially dominant individuals, small males produced comparable numbers of offspring as the treatment with large males, although the offspring of these uninhibited small males were smaller at the end of the growing season than the young of large males. Thus, interactions among conspecifics may account for much of the phenotypic diversity observed within and among natural fathead minnow populations, through their direct and indirect effects on growth, recruitment and survival.

Key words: alternative phenotypes, conditional strategy, fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, reproduction, social environment, status-dependent.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J HeredHome page
M. L. Bessert, J. Brozek, and G. Orti
Impact of Nest Substrate Limitations on Patterns of Illegitimacy in the Fathead Minnow, Pimephales promelas (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae)
J. Hered., November 5, 2007; (2007) esm092v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.