Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Engeler, B.
Right arrow Articles by Reyer, H.-U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Engeler, B.
Right arrow Articles by Reyer, H.-U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 5: 600-606
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Choosy females and indiscriminate males: mate choice in mixed populations of sexual and hybridogenetic water frogs (Rana lessonae, Rana esculenta)

Beat Engeler and Heinz-Ulrich Reyer

Zoological Institute, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland

Address correspondence to H.-U. Reyer. E-mail: ulireyer{at}zool.unizh.ch .

For several decades, behavioral ecologists have studied the effects of the environment on the behavior of individuals; but only fairly recently they have started to ask the reverse question: how do the behavioral strategies of individuals affect the composition and dynamics of populations and communities? Although intuitively obvious, this feedback from individual to higher levels is difficult to demonstrate, except in systems with exceptionally fast and marked responses of the populations to the behavior of its members. Such a system exists in sperm-dependent species. In European water frogs, for instance, successful reproduction of a hybrid species (R. esculenta, genotype LR) requires mating with one of its parental species (R. lessonae, genotype LL), except in the rare cases where hybrids are triploid. The sexual host LL, however, should avoid matings with the sexual parasite LR, because the resulting LR offspring will eliminate the L genome from their germ line. In this study we investigate how this conflict is solved. Since water frog hybrids come in both sexes, rather than as females only like in other sperm-dependent systems, we performed the tests with both females and males. One individual was given a choice between two individuals of the opposite sex, one an LL and the other an LR. In both species, females showed the predicted preference for LL males, whereas males did not discriminate between LL and LR females. On the individual level, we interpret the sex difference in choosiness by the lower costs from mating with the wrong species (LR) and the higher benefits from mating with large individuals in males than in females. In "normal" species, male preference for large (i.e. more fecund) females is advantageous, but in this system such a choice can result in mating with the larger LR females. With respect to the structure and dynamics of mixed populations, we discuss that the observed female preference is consistent with the higher mating success of LL males found in nature. Hence, mate female choice is a strong candidate for a mechanism promoting coexistence of the sperm-dependent hybrid and its sexual host. This confirms predictions from previous theoretical models.

Key words: coexistence, fitness, hybridogenesis, male competition, mate choice, population dynamics, reproductive success.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.