Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Srygley, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Srygley, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 5: 607-611
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Sexual differences in tailwind drift compensation in Phoebis sennae butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) migrating over seas

Robert B. Srygley

Department of Zoology, South Parks Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK, and Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apdo. 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama

Address correspondence to R.B. Srygley at the University of Oxford. E-mail: bob.srygley{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk .

One prediction derived from optimal migration theory is that migrating animals that maximize their flight distance on a given amount of energy will decrease their airspeed in a tailwind and increase it in a headwind. To test this in a migrating butterfly, I followed male and female cloudless sulfur butterflies Phoebis sennae (Pieridae) migrating from Colombia toward Panama over the Caribbean Sea. P. sennae headed westerly over the Caribbean Sea in the morning and then turned southeasterly to head downwind in the afternoon. Changes in heading and track directions of P. sennae were not related to changes in the position of the solar azimuth. As predicted from optimal migration theory, flight velocities of females decreased in a tailwind to minimize energy consumption. However, males did not show any compensation for tailwinds. Females are minimizing energy consumption, whereas males may be minimizing the time to reach the destination site in order to maximize matings with newly arrived or newly emerged females. Orientation of females changed before that of males, presumably because their greater reproductive load imposed greater flight costs and limited flight fuels.

Key words: Caribbean, cloudless sulfur butterfly, drift compensation, flight, migration, orientation, Phoebis sennae, tropical butterflies, sexual dimorphism.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. B. Srygley and R. Dudley
Optimal strategies for insects migrating in the flight boundary layer: mechanisms and consequences
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2008; 48(1): 119 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.