Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nunn, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zinner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nunn, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Zinner, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 5: 646-654
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Do exaggerated sexual swellings function in female mating competition in primates? A comparative test of the reliable indicator hypothesis

Charles L. Nunna, Carel P. van Schaikb and Dietmar Zinnerc

a Department of Biology, 221 Gilmer Hall, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA b Department of Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Box 90383, Duke University, Durham, NC 22708-0383, USA c Abteilung Verhaltensforschung und Ökologie, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Kellnerweg 4, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany

Address correspondence to C.L. Nunn, who is now at Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail: charlie.nunn{at}virginia.edu .

The reliable indicator hypothesis proposes that exaggerated sexual swellings in female primates serve as honest signals of female quality that function in female—female competition over mates. We examined a version of this hypothesis using interspecific data to test whether exaggerated sexual swellings are associated with female mating competition, as measured using the adult sex ratio, female canine size, and expected female mating synchrony. The ratio of females to males and relative canine size declined over evolutionary transitions in swelling state, thus providing no support for the reliable indicator hypothesis. Expected female mating synchrony increased over evolutionary transitions in swelling state, but this pattern did not approach significance, and the patterns were opposite to predictions when controlling for the number of males in the group. In addition to these comparative tests, we reviewed evidence concerning individual attributes of females relative to characteristics of their swellings. Contrary to the reliable indicator hypothesis, the least fertile females, or those least likely to raise surviving offspring, often have larger swellings. We consider the statistical power of our tests, discuss the theoretical and empirical bases for our comparative predictions, and consider other lines of evidence needed to test the reliable indicator hypothesis. We also discuss an alternative hypothesis, the graded signal hypothesis, which combines the benefits of biasing and confusing paternity through a novel mechanism and is testable in the field and the laboratory.

Key words: comparative study, communication, honest signaling, independent contrasts, primates, sexual swellings.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. Maestripieri and J. R. Roney
Primate copulation calls and postcopulatory female choice
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 106 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. M. Setchell and E. J. Wickings
Sexual swelling in mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx): a test of the reliable indicator hypothesis
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 438 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.