Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaus, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sakaluk, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schaus, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sakaluk, S. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 6: 740-745
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: not all species play games

Jennifer M. Schaus and Scott K. Sakaluk

Behavior, Ecology, Evolution and Systematics Section, Department of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

Address correspondence to S.K. Sakaluk. E-mail: sksakal{at}ilstu.edu . J. Schaus is now at the Missouri Botanical Garden, Education Department, PO Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

Costs incurred in the manufacture of ejaculates may constrain the number of sperm that males can produce, so males should show some economy in their allocation of sperm across multiple matings. In species in which females mate with multiple males and are capable of storing sperm for extended periods, sperm allocation of males should be tailored to the risk of sperm competition. Recent game theory predicts that males should transfer the least sperm when there are no other rivals, and the most sperm when only one other rival is likely to inseminate the female. However, as the numbers of competitors increases beyond two, the models predict a corresponding decrease in ejaculate expenditure. We tested these predictions in three cricket species, Gryllodes sigillatus, Gryllus veletis, and Gryllus texensis, assessing the sperm allocation of males held under three levels of apparent interrival competition: no rivals, one rival and six rivals. Sperm allocation of G. veletis varied according to theory: males increased their sperm allocation with an increased risk of sperm competition (no rivals vs. one), but decreased their allocation with an increased intensity of sperm competition (one rival vs. six). Sperm allocation of male G. texensis showed no significant response to the density of rivals, and sperm allocation in G. sigillatus was influenced by an unexpected interaction between treatment density and the order in which males experienced the three treatments. The observed interspecific variation in facultative sperm allocation may be due to interspecific differences in population density, rearing environment, or female mating behavior.

Key words: crickets, Gryllodes, nuptial food gifts, sexual selection, spermatophore, sperm competition.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. A. Vaughn, J. delBarco-Trillo, and M. H. Ferkin
Sperm investment in male meadow voles is affected by the condition of the nearby male conspecifics
Behav. Ecol., July 30, 2008; (2008) arn092v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J MOLLUS STUDHome page
J. M. Koene, M. J. Loose, and L. Wolters
MATE CHOICE IS NOT AFFECTED BY MATING HISTORY IN THE SIMULTANEOUSLY HERMAPHRODITIC SNAIL LYMNAEA STAGNALIS
J. Mollus. Stud., July 28, 2008; (2008) eyn020v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. S. Aspbury
Sperm competition effects on sperm production and expenditure in sailfin mollies, Poecilia latipinna
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 776 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. A. Ramm and P. Stockley
Ejaculate allocation under varying sperm competition risk in the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 491 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. delBarco-Trillo and M. H. Ferkin
Male meadow voles respond differently to risk and intensity of sperm competition
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 581 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
Z. Tang-Martinez and T. B. Ryder
The Problem with Paradigms: Bateman's Worldview as a Case Study
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
P. G. Byrne
Male sperm expenditure under sperm competition risk and intensity in quacking frogs
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 857 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
F. Garcia-Gonzalez and M. Gomendio
Adjustment of copula duration and ejaculate size according to the risk of sperm competition in the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata)
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 23 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Pilastro, M. Scaggiante, and M. B. Rasotto
Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory
PNAS, July 23, 2002; 99(15): 9913 - 9915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.