Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worden, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Worden, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, P. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 6: 761-767
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Polyandry in grain beetles, Tenebrio molitor, leads to greater reproductive success: material or genetic benefits?

Bradley D. Worden and Patricia G. Parker

Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Address correspondence to B.D. Worden, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1735 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. E-mail: worden.4{at}osu.edu . P.G. Parker is now at the Department of Biology, University of Missouri-St. Louis, 8001 Natural Bridge Road, St. Louis, MO 63121, USA.

Females that mate with more than one male may derive both material and genetic benefits, and differentiating between the two benefits is often difficult. We tested for both material and genetic effects associated with multiple mating in the highly promiscuous yellow mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Females that mated four times to the same male laid more eggs and produced more larvae than females that mated only once. Whether copulations occurred on the same day or over several days, the result was an immediate increase in the production of eggs by females. Some females were kept on a restricted diet to test whether nutrients in the spermatophore disproportionately benefitted food-deprived females. Although females on poor diets produced fewer and smaller offspring, diet did not significantly affect the proportional benefit of mating treatment on female fecundity. By controlling for male mating history, we were able to separate the effects of mating with different males from the effects of receiving multiple spermatophores from the same male. Females that mated with four different males achieved substantial gains in numbers of eggs produced (32% increase) beyond those of females that mated an identical number of times with the same male. We found no evidence that males allocate fewer sperm to previous mates. Egg hatchability was unaffected by mating behavior, suggesting that genetic incompatibility at that stage is not responsible for the low reproductive success of females mated with a single male. These results suggest that females may delay or reduce oviposition or may be incapable of achieving maximal fecundity until they have gained the material and/or genetic benefits of mating with multiple males.

Key words: beetles, ejaculate pheromones, genetic compatibility, polyandry, Tenebrio molitor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. B. McNamara, R. L. Brown, M. A. Elgar, and T. M. Jones
Paternity costs from polyandry compensated by increased fecundity in the hide beetle
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 433 - 440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
Z. Tang-Martinez and T. B. Ryder
The Problem with Paradigms: Bateman's Worldview as a Case Study
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
P. G. Parker and Z. Tang-Martinez
Bateman Gradients in Field and Laboratory Studies: A Cautionary Tale
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2005; 45(5): 895 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.