Behavioral Ecology Vol. 12 No. 6: 768-772
© 2001 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Benefit by contrast: an experiment with live aposematic prey
Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
Address correspondence to G. Gamberale-Stille. E-mail: gabriella.gamberale{at}zoologi.su.se .
Aposematic prey often have a coloration that contrasts with the background. One beneficial effect of such conspicuous coloration is that it produces faster and more durable avoidance by predators. Another suggested benefit is that prey that contrast with the background are more quickly discerned and recognized as unpalatable by experienced predators. To further investigate the effects of prey contrast on predator behavior, I conducted an experiment with young chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) as predators on live aposematic and nonaposematic prey. Birds with prior experience of both prey types were allowed into an arena with both palatable prey and aposematic prey on backgrounds that either closely matched or contrasted with the coloration of the aposematic prey. Also, the time a bird had available to decide to attack a prey was manipulated by including a competing chick or not. The experienced birds showed greater attack latencies for aposematic prey on more contrasting backgrounds, and aposematic prey were also attacked to a greater extent when on a matching background. The presence of a competitor generated similar effects, where birds in high competition attacked more and faster compared to birds subjected to lower degree of competition, but there was no interaction between competition and contrast. Thus, the experiment provides evidence that prey contrast against the background may produce better recognition and avoidance, independently of predator viewing time.
Key words: aposematism, avoidance learning, defense, foraging behavior, Heteroptera, Lygaeidae, predation, signal intensity, warning coloration.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Aronsson and G. Gamberale-Stille Importance of internal pattern contrast and contrast against the background in aposematic signals Behav. Ecol., November 2, 2009; (2009) arp141v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. S. Hunter Familiarity breeds contempt: effects of striped skunk color, shape, and abundance on wild carnivore behavior Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1315 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Stevens, I. S Winney, A. Cantor, and J. Graham Outline and surface disruption inanimal camouflage Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2009; 276(1657): 781 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Stevens, J. Graham, I. S Winney, and A. Cantor Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction? Biol Lett, December 23, 2008; 4(6): 648 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.D Ham and D Osorio Colour preferences and colour vision in poultry chicks Proc R Soc B, August 22, 2007; 274(1621): 1941 - 1948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Stevens Predator perception and the interrelation between different forms of protective coloration Proc R Soc B, June 22, 2007; 274(1617): 1457 - 1464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hauglund, S. B. Hagen, and H. M. Lampe Responses of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) to multimodal aposematic signals Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2006; 17(3): 392 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|