Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 2: 188-192
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Does paternity or paternal investment determine the level of paternal care and does female choice explain egg stealing in the fifteen-spined stickleback?
Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
Address correspondence to S. Östlund-Nilsson, who is now at VTHRC, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia. E-mail: saraon{at}mailbox.uq.edu.au .
An earlier field study on the fifteen-spined stickleback (Spinachia spinachia) showed that frequent male—male interactions result in high frequencies of sneaking and egg stealing. Moreover, sneaking behavior was performed not only by males adopting alternative mating strategies, but also by males with their own nests. The advantage of sneaking is easily understood, but it is more difficult to explain the evolutionary benefit of stealing eggs from other males. I investigated whether males suffering from sneaking adjust their paternal effort in relation to their degree of paternity. I also examined whether females prefer males that have more eggs in their nests, as this could explain egg stealing. There was no relationship between the degree of paternity and fanning activity, hatching success, or nest defense. However, the older the eggs become, the more the males increase their attack rate toward potential egg predators (goldsinny wrasse and shore crabs). Thus, males adjusted their level of defense to the amount of energy and time already invested in the clutch. Females did not prefer males with more eggs in their nests. On the contrary, females preferred males with reduced clutches over males with enlarged clutches. Therefore, female choice is unlikely to be a driving force behind egg stealing in this species.
Key words: egg stealing, female choice, paternal investment, paternity, Spinachia spinachia, sticklebacks.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  O. Svensson and C. Kvarnemo Parasitic spawning in sand gobies: an experimental assessment of nest-opening size, sneaker male cues, paternity, and filial cannibalism Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 410 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Rios-Cardenas and M. S. Webster Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Steinhart, M. E. Sandrene, S. Weaver, R. A. Stein, and E. A. Marschall Increased parental care cost for nest-guarding fish in a lake with hyperabundant nest predators Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 427 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|