Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rychlik, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jancewicz, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rychlik, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jancewicz, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 2: 216-223
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Prey size, prey nutrition, and food handling by shrews of different body sizes

Leszek Rychlika and Elzbieta Jancewiczb

a Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 17-230 Bialowieza, Poland b Department of Forest Zoology and Wildlife Management, Agricultural University SGGW, Rakowiecka 26/30, 02-528 Warsaw, Poland

Address correspondence to L. Rychlik. E-mail: lrychlik{at}bison.zbs.bialowieza.pl .

We tested some predictions relating metabolic constraints of foraging behavior and prey selection by comparing food handling and utilization in four sympatric shrew species: Sorex minutus (mean body mass = 3.0 g), S. araneus (8.0 g), Neomys anomalus (10.0 g), and N. fodiens (14.4 g). Live fly larvae, mealworm larvae, and aquatic arthropods were offered to shrews as small prey (body mass <0.1 g). Live earthworms, snails, and small fish were offered as large prey (>0.3 g). The larvae were the high-nutrition food (>8 kJ/g), and the other prey were the low-nutrition food (<4 kJ/g). The smallest shrew, S. minutus, utilized (ate + hoarded) <30% of offered food, and the other species utilized >48% of food. The larger the shrew, the more prey it ate per capita. However, highly energetic insect larvae composed 75% of food utilized by S. minutus and only >40% of the food utilized by the other species. Thus, inverse relationships appeared between shrew body mass and mass-specific food mass utilization and between shrew body mass and mass-specific food energy utilization: the largest shrew, N. fodiens, utilized the least food mass and the least energy quantity per 1 g of its body mass. Also, the proportion of food hoarded by shrews decreased with increase in size of shrew. With the exception of S. araneus, the size of prey hoarded by the shrews was significantly larger than the size of prey eaten. Tiny S. minutus hoarded and ate smaller prey items than the other shrews, and large N. fodiens hoarded larger prey than the other shrews.

Key words: energy requirements, food hoarding, foraging behavior, optimal foraging strategy, prey energetic value, prey size preferences.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.