| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 2: 260-267
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Kleptoparasitism and the distribution of unequal competitors
Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
Address correspondence to I.M. Hamilton, who is now at the Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada. E-mail: ihamilt{at}vax2.concordia.ca .
Kleptoparasitism is an important means by which many animals obtain limited resources. The success of kleptoparasitism may be influenced by a number of factors, including competitive differences among individuals and the spatial distribution of prey and hosts. I used ideal free distribution (IFD) theory to predict the spatial distribution of kleptoparasites and their hosts between two patches differing in quality and to predict how the use of kleptoparasitism was influenced by the relative searching and fighting abilities of classes of competitors. Unlike previous IFD models incorporating kleptoparasitism, I allowed competitors to choose between attempting kleptoparasitism or searching for undefended prey. When the rates of resource inputs into the patches were high, the model predicted little use of kleptoparasitism. If competitive types were equally able to displace others from resources, then those individuals that were poorer at searching for food were more likely to kleptoparasitize. If competitive types differed in their abilities to displace others, kleptoparasites were exclusively those individuals that were best able to do so. Regardless of their competitive type, a higher proportion of individuals in the high-quality patch were kleptoparasitic, while the total density of competitors in the high-quality patch was lower than that expected based on the ratio of resource inputs. These predictions differ from previous IFD models of kleptoparasitism, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in searching for and obtaining resources can influence the spatial distribution of animals.
Key words: habitat use, ideal free distribution, producer-scrounger model, searching efficiency, simulation model.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Ridley and N. Raihani Facultative response to a kleptoparasite by the cooperatively breeding pied babbler Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Smallegange and J. van der Meer Interference from a game theoretical perspective: shore crabs suffer most from equal competitors Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 215 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kun, G. Boza, and I. Scheuring Asynchronous snowdrift game with synergistic effect as a model of cooperation Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 633 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Shealer, J. A. Spendelow, J. S. Hatfield, and I. C. T. Nisbet The adaptive significance of stealing in a marine bird and its relationship to parental quality Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 371 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. M. Hamilton and L. M. Dill The use of territorial gardening versus kleptoparasitism by a subtropical reef fish (Kyphosus cornelii) is influenced by territory defendability Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 561 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|