Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 291-300
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
The evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups: when should helpers pay to stay?
a Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK b Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of Biomedical & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK c School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
Address correspondence to H. Kokko, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. E-mail: h.kokko{at}bio.gla.ac.uk .
We used a reproductive skew framework to consider the evolution of parental and alloparental effort in cooperatively breeding groups. The model provides the first theoretical treatment of rent payment (the "pay-to-stay" hypothesis) for the evolution of helping behavior of subordinates. According to this hypothesis, not all helping behavior is kin selected, but group members help in order to be allowed to stay in the group and potentially gain breeding positions later in life. We show that reproductive concessions may be replaced by complete skew and voluntary, costly alloparental effort by subordinates once future prospects are included in fitness calculations. This suggests that incomplete skew observed in long-lived species is not due to dominant control over reproduction. Rent payment is predicted to occur when relatedness between subordinate and dominant is low, survival is high, ecological constraints are at least moderately tight, and retaining nonhelping subordinates harms the dominant's fitness. Rent may also be required from related subordinates if helping is very costly (leading to low voluntary helping effort) and ecological constraints are moderately tight. However, related subordinates do not need to have a positive net effect on the dominant's direct fitness to be accepted as group members. We also consider compensatory responses of dominant group members as a potential threat to the stability of renting behavior. If dominants trade off parental effort against their own survival, they may selfishly reduce their own parental effort as a response to increased help. As this improves their own survival, the prospects of territorial inheritance diminish for the subordinate, and subordinates should hence be less willing to accept the rent agreement. However, we show that compensatory responses by "lazy" parents prevent group formation only in borderline cases.
Key words: alloparental care, cooperative breeding, helping at the nest, reproductive skew.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. M. Johns, K. J. Howard, N. L. Breisch, A. Rivera, and B. L. Thorne Nonrelatives inherit colony resources in a primitive termite PNAS, October 13, 2009; 106(41): 17452 - 17456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. McDonald, A. J.N. Kazem, M. F. Clarke, and J. Wright Helping as a signal: does removal of potential audiences alter helper behavior in the bell miner? Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1047 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Pacheco, P. G. McDonald, J. Wright, A. J.N. Kazem, and M. F. Clarke Helper contributions to antiparasite behavior in the cooperatively breeding bell miner Behav. Ecol., February 7, 2008; (2008) arm163v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Russell, N. E. Langmore, A. Cockburn, L. B. Astheimer, and R. M. Kilner Reduced Egg Investment Can Conceal Helper Effects in Cooperatively Breeding Birds Science, August 17, 2007; 317(5840): 941 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Y.L Wong, P. M Buston, P. L Munday, and G. P Jones The threat of punishment enforces peaceful cooperation and stabilizes queues in a coral-reef fish Proc R Soc B, April 22, 2007; 274(1613): 1093 - 1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Reeve and S.-F. Shen A missing model in reproductive skew theory: The bordered tug-of-war PNAS, May 30, 2006; 103(22): 8430 - 8434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Zink and H. K. Reeve Predicting the temporal dynamics of reproductive skew and group membership in communal breeders Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 880 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A Stiver, P. Dierkes, M. Taborsky, H Lisle Gibbs, and S. Balshine Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions Proc R Soc B, August 7, 2005; 272(1572): 1593 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Brouwer, D. Heg, and M. Taborsky Experimental evidence for helper effects in a cooperatively breeding cichlid Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 667 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Griffin and S. A. West Kin Discrimination and the Benefit of Helping in Cooperatively Breeding Vertebrates Science, October 24, 2003; 302(5645): 634 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Griffin, J. M. Pemberton, P. N. M. Brotherton, G. McIlrath, D. Gaynor, R. Kansky, J. O'Riain, and T. H. Clutton-Brock A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta) Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 472 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



