Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 353-358
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
The costs of copulating in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea
Zoologisches Museum, Universität Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
Address correspondence to W.U. Blanckenhorn. E-mail: wolfman{at}zoolmus.unizh.ch .
Finding, assessing, rejecting, and copulating with a mate is assumed to carry fitness costs, particularly for females, that have to be traded off against fitness benefits of mating such as increased fecundity, fertility, longevity, or better quality offspring. Female dung flies, Sepsis cynipsea (Diptera: Sepsidae), typically attempt to dislodge mounted males harassing them by vigorous shaking. Shaking duration has been shown to reflect both direct and indirect female choice in this species. The latter is an expression of the females' general reluctance to mate due to presumed costs of mating. We investigated the costs of copulation in the laboratory. Females were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups and allowed to copulate either not at all, once, or twice. The males' armored genitalia injured females internally during copula. Injuries were visible as sclerotized scars in the female ovipositor, and their occurrence increased with mating frequency. Presumably due to these injuries, mated females showed higher mortality. This effect was statistically independent from additional costs of reproduction related to oviposition, as copulation also increased lifetime egg production and tended to augment oviposition rate (eggs per day), while fertility (proportion of offspring emerged) was unaffected. We thus found high mortality costs of copulating, indicating substantial sexual conflict, which helps explain female reluctance to mate in this species.
Key words: female reluctance, genitalia, internal injuries, mating behavior, mating costs, sexual conflict, sexual selection.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. R. Garner, R. N. Bortoluzzi, D. D. Heath, and B. D. Neff Sexual conflict inhibits female mate choice for major histocompatibility complex dissimilarity in Chinook salmon Proc R Soc B, October 28, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1639v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Welke and J. M. Schneider Inbreeding avoidance through cryptic female choice in the cannibalistic orb-web spider Argiope lobata Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2009; 20(5): 1056 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. K. Darden, R. James, I. W. Ramnarine, and D. P. Croft Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2009; 276(1667): 2651 - 2656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Plath, A. M. Makowicz, I. Schlupp, and M. Tobler Sexual harassment in live-bearing fishes (Poeciliidae): comparing courting and noncourting species Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 680 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ronn, M. Katvala, and G. Arnqvist Coevolution between harmful male genitalia and female resistance in seed beetles PNAS, June 26, 2007; 104(26): 10921 - 10925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. E Eady, L. Hamilton, and R. E Lyons Copulation, genital damage and early death in Callosobruchus maculatus Proc R Soc B, January 22, 2007; 274(1607): 247 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G.A Parker Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview Phil Trans R Soc B, February 28, 2006; 361(1466): 235 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M Lessells The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict Phil Trans R Soc B, February 28, 2006; 361(1466): 301 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. M Ivy, C. B Weddle, and S. K Sakaluk Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates Proc R Soc B, December 7, 2005; 272(1580): 2475 - 2478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. B Fonseca, C. L Brancato, A. E Prior, P. M.J Shelton, and M. R.J Sheehy Death rates reflect accumulating brain damage in arthropods Proc R Soc B, September 22, 2005; 272(1575): 1941 - 1948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Edvardsson and T. Tregenza Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 788 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. L. M. Lee and G. C. Hays Polyandry in a marine turtle: Females make the best of a bad job PNAS, April 27, 2004; 101(17): 6530 - 6535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Balloux and L. Lehmann Random Mating With a Finite Number of Matings Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 2313 - 2315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. H. Morrow, G. Arnqvist, and S. Pitnick Adaptation versus pleiotropy: why do males harm their mates? Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 802 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Muhlhauser and W. U. Blanckenhorn The costs of avoiding matings in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2002; 13(3): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|