Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, G.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, G.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 375-380
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Female greater wax moths reduce sexual display behavior in relation to the potential risk of predation by echolocating bats

Gareth Jones, Anna Barabas, Wendy Elliott and Stuart Parsons

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, UK

Address correspondence to G. Jones. E-mail: gareth.jones{at}bris.ac.uk .

Female greater wax moths Galleria mellonella display by wing fanning in response to bursts of ultrasonic calls produced by males. The temporal and spectral characteristics of these calls show some similarities with the echolocation calls of bats that emit frequency-modulated (FM) signals. Female G. mellonella therefore need to distinguish between the attractive signals of male conspecifics, which may lead to mating opportunities, and similar sounds made by predatory bats. We therefore predicted that (1) females would display in response to playbacks of male calls; (2) females would not display in response to playbacks of the calls of echolocating bats (we used the calls of Daubenton's bat Myotis daubentonii as representative of a typical FM echolocating bat); and (3) when presented with male calls and bat calls during the same time block, females would display more when perceived predation risk was lower. We manipulated predation risk in two ways. First, we varied the intensity of bat calls to represent a nearby (high risk) or distant (low risk) bat. Second, we played back calls of bats searching for prey (low risk) and attacking prey (high risk). All predictions were supported, suggesting that female G. mellonella are able to distinguish conspecific male mating calls from bat calls, and that they modify display rate in relation to predation risk. The mechanism (s) by which the moths separate the calls of bat and moth must involve temporal cues. Bat and moth signals differ considerably in duration, and differences in duration could be encoded by the moth's nervous system and used in discrimination.

Key words: bats, echolocation, mating behavior, moths, predation risk, ultrasound.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
T. W. Kim, J. H Christy, S. Dennenmoser, and J. C Choe
The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk
Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2009; 276(1657): 775 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
N. Skals, P. Anderson, M. Kanneworff, C. Lofstedt, and A. Surlykke
Her odours make him deaf: crossmodal modulation of olfaction and hearing in a male moth
J. Exp. Biol., February 15, 2005; 208(4): 595 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. B. Johnson and A. L. Basolo
Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2003; 14(5): 619 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.