Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persons, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rypstra, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Persons, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Rypstra, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 386-392
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Fitness costs and benefits of antipredator behavior mediated by chemotactile cues in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae)

Matthew H. Personsa, Sean E. Walkera and Ann L. Rypstrab

a Department of Zoology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA b Department of Zoology, Miami University, Hamilton, OH 45011, USA

Address correspondence to M.H. Persons, who is now at the Department of Biology, Susquehanna University, Selinsgrove, PA 17870, USA. E-mail: persons{at}susqu.edu .

Animals may exhibit a variety of defensive behaviors in the presence of indirect predator cues. Such behavior offers immediate fitness benefits but may also incur substantial foraging and reproductive costs. We measured shifts in space use (vertical climbing) by the wolf spider Pardosa milvina induced by chemotactile cues (silk and excreta) from a co-occurring predatory wolf spider Hogna helluo. We then measured foraging and reproductive costs, as well as survival benefits, of this behavior. For 2 weeks, we maintained mated adult female Pardosa in plastic containers with one of three treated peat moss substrates: a container previously occupied by a conspecific for 3 days, a container previously occupied by an adult Hogna for 3 days, and a container devoid of either cue (control). We measured prey capture efficiency, body condition, egg sac production, egg sac weight, and egg number for individuals in each treatment. We also counted the number of Pardosa that survived and exhibited climbing behavior in the presence of a live Hogna with and without silk and excreta cues. Pardosa climbed container walls significantly more often in the presence of Hogna silk and excreta relative to other treatments. Pardosa exposed to Hogna cues coupled with live Hogna survived significantly longer than spiders that had no predator cues available. Pardosa placed in containers with Hogna cues, but no Hogna, lost weight more quickly, ate fewer prey, were in poorer body condition, produced lighter egg sacs, and produced fewer eggs than spiders in control or conspecific treatments.

Key words: antipredator behavior, chemotactile cues, Hogna helluo, Lycosidae, Pardosa milvina, reproductive costs, survival benefits, wolf spiders.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. D. Hoefler, M. H. Persons, and A. L. Rypstra
Evolutionarily costly courtship displays in a wolf spider: a test of viability indicator theory
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 974 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. O. Elias, E. A. Hebets, and R. R. Hoy
Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 765 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. Lind and W. Cresswell
Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 945 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.