Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerlach, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bartmann, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gerlach, G.
Right arrow Articles by Bartmann, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 3: 408-418
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Reproductive skew, costs, and benefits of cooperative breeding in female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus)

Gabriele Gerlach and Susann Bartmann

Fakultät für Biologie, Postfach 5560, Universität Konstanz, D-78434 Konstanz, Germany

Address correspondence to G. Gerlach, who is now at the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1015, USA. E-mail: ggerlach{at}mbl.edu .

Two current models seek to explain reproduction of subordinates in social groups: incentives given by dominants for peacefully remaining in the group (reproductive skew model) or incomplete control by dominants. These models make different predictions concerning genetic relatedness between individuals for the distribution of reproduction and the stability of cooperative breeding associations. To test these models and to further explore the relationships between reproductive skew, genetic relatedness, and investment of each participant, we performed behavioral observations of female wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) raising pups communally. Our results do not support previous models. Differences in lifetime reproductive success were significantly greater within mother—daughter pairs than within pairs of sisters or unrelated females. Subordinate females of either breeding unit did not differ in their direct reproduction. Calculations of inclusive fitness based on our results lead to the following predictions: (1) Communal nests should occur only when ecological circumstances prevent solitary breeding. (2) Subordinate females gain the highest inclusive fitness joining their mothers; they also show the highest nursing investment. (3) Mothers should accept daughters, who have no opportunity for solitary breeding. (4) Dominant sisters and unrelated females should reject subordinate females because cooperative breeding reduces their reproductive success. However, breeding units of dominant sisters and unrelated females nevertheless occur and can be explained by our finding that such females significantly reduce nursing time, which may help them save energy for future breeding cycles. Our data demonstrate that both genetic relatedness and investment skew are important in the complex evolution of reproductive skew in cooperative breeding.

Key words: Apodemus sylvaticus, cooperative breeding, reproductive skew, wood mice.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. B Silk
The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2007; 362(1480): 539 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. K. Reeve and S.-F. Shen
A missing model in reproductive skew theory: The bordered tug-of-war
PNAS, May 30, 2006; 103(22): 8430 - 8434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.