Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kemp, D. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 4: 456-461
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Butterfly contests and flight physiology: why do older males fight harder?

Darrell J. Kemp

School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, PO Box 6811, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia

Address correspondence to D.J. Kemp, who is now at the Department of Biology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1501, USA. E-mail: darrell.kemp{at}asu.edu.au .

The males of many butterfly species compete for territories via conspicuous aerial wars of attrition, in which the determinants of persistence ability are largely unclear. Flight performance features, such as stamina, acceleration, and maneuverability, are often assumed to be important in this context, yet there is no direct evidence by which to evaluate these possibilities. Recent research has indicated that competitive ability increases with age in a notably territorial species, Hypolimnas bolina, which could arise from lifetime morphological or physiological changes that directly affect flight performance. I evaluated this hypothesis by investigating how size-independent variance in body composition, energy stores, flight muscle ratio (FMR), and wing condition change with age in this species. Males in five age categories (spanning the functional life span of territorial individuals) were sampled from encounter sites in tropical Australia. Analysis of body composition with respect to an estimate of eclosion mass (forewing length) indicated that total body mass, abdomen mass, and wing area decrease throughout an individual's lifetime, but thorax mass remains unchanged. Wing loading (the ratio of wing area to body mass) is lowest in intermediately aged individuals, but FMR and energetic status remain largely similar regardless of age. On average, therefore, the energetic cost of sustained flight should first decrease, then increase, with age in a male H. bolina (of standardized body size), while available energy reserves decline slightly. Acceleration and maneuverability should remain relatively constant. These results, coupled with the fact that body size is unrelated to contest success in this territorial butterfly, fail to support the idea that age-related competitive ability is mediated simply by energetics or flight performance.

Key words: biophysiology, intrasexual contest competition, Lepidoptera, sexual selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. T. Trumbo
Age-related reproductive performance in the parental burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis
Behav. Ecol., June 19, 2009; (2009) arp082v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
M. Bergman, K. Gotthard, D. Berger, M. Olofsson, D. J Kemp, and C. Wiklund
Mating success of resident versus non-resident males in a territorial butterfly
Proc R Soc B, July 7, 2007; 274(1618): 1659 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.