Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shanks, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shanks, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 4: 467-471
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Previous agonistic experience determines both foraging behavior and territoriality in the limpet Lottia gigantea (Sowerby)

Alan L. Shanks

University of Oregon, Oregon Institute of Marine Biology, PO Box 5389, Charleston, OR 97420, USA

Address correspondence to A.L. Shanks. E-mail: ashanks{at}oimb.uoregon.edu .

Lottia gigantea, the owl limpet, is an algal gardener. Territorial individuals actively defend gardens, which consist of cleared areas in the intertidal zone upon which a thick algal film develops and upon which the territory holder feeds. Smaller, nonterritory holders raid these gardens and graze the algal film. Territorial individuals must obtain an adequate ration without compromising the productivity of the garden. In contrast, a nonterritory holder grazing on another limpet's territory must obtain an adequate ration before it contacts the territory holder and is driven off. In the laboratory, replicate sets of 10 limpets were trained to behave territorially and nonterritorially. Training mimicked natural encounters between territorial and nonterritorial L. gigantea. Limpets given territorial training left significantly (t = -4.92, df = 9, p =.00041) more algal cover behind when grazing (on average 71%) than did limpets trained to be nonterritorial (on average 50%). Territorial limpets seldom grazed over the same area more than once (4% of the grazed area). In contrast, nonterritorial limpets frequently foraged over an area more than once; of the area grazed, 20% had been visited more than once. Previous agonistic experience determines both territorial behavior and foraging strategies, two of the critical behaviors necessary for successful gardening behavior. Nonterritorial limpets maximize consumption per unit area, whereas territorial limpets appear to forage prudently, leaving a significantly greater proportion of the plant biomass behind.

Key words: foraging, gardening, grazing, limpets, Lottia gigantea, territoriality.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.