| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Behavioral Ecology Vol. 13 No. 5: 664-669
© 2002 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Conditional strategies in territorial defense: do Carolina wrens play tit-for-tat?
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Address correspondence to J. Hyman, who is now at the Department of Biology, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708, USA. E-mail: jhyman{at}duke.edu.
Neighboring territorial animals are viewed primarily as intense rivals, but there are also opportunities for cooperation among competitors. Many animals respond less aggressively toward neighbors than to strangers. This phenomenon, termed the "dear enemy" effect, should be stable only when the reduced aggression is reciprocal. Territory owners should use conditional strategies in territorial defense, showing reduced aggression toward neighbors who cooperate by respecting territorial boundaries but increasing aggression toward invading neighbors. In this study I examined the response of territory owners to playbacks of neighbors at shared boundaries before and after intrusions by that neighbor or by strangers. Results showed that territory owners did not increase their aggression toward defecting neighbors but did increase their aggression toward neighbors after a simulated intrusion by a stranger. This surprising result might reflect the long-term relationship between neighboring Carolina wrens and the threat posed by rare intruding strangers.
Key words: communication, cooperation, territoriality, tit-for-tat, Thryothorus ludovicianus, wrens.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Chaves-Campos, Y.-m. Araya-Ajoy, C. A. Lizana-Moreno, and K. N. Rabenold The effect of local dominance and reciprocal tolerance on feeding aggregations of ocellated antbirds Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2009; 276(1675): 3995 - 4001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|