Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 3: 340-346
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
No evidence for differential maternal allocation to offspring in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus)
a Laboratoire de Parasitologie Evolutive, CNRS UMR 7103, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bât. A, 7ème étage, 7 quai St. Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France b Centre d'Etudes Biologique de Chizé, CNRS UPR 1934, F-79360 Beauvoir-sur-Niort, France
Address correspondences to J. Mazuc. E-mail: jmazuc{at}snv.jussieu.fr.
We tested the differential maternal allocation hypothesis in a population of house sparrows. We experimentally altered the attractiveness of males by treating them with implants filled with crystalline testosterone (T) or left empty (C). We subsequently monitored maternal investment as a function of male hormonal treatment and the size of the black patch of feathers on the throat (i.e., the badge), a sexually selected trait. The differential allocation hypothesis predicts that females should adjust their investment with respect to the benefits they receive by mating with an attractive male. Given that both circulating levels of T and badge size are condition-dependent traits, we expected that females mated with T males and/or with large-badged males should invest more into current reproduction. Contrary to this prediction, we found no evidence that suggested differential maternal allocation in this population of house sparrows. Female investment in yolk T, yolk mass, clutch size, chick brooding, and feeding was not affected by male hormonal treatment or by male badge size. As expected, T males invested less into chick brooding and feeding. More surprisingly, females did not compensate the reduced paternal contribution to chick feeding. As a consequence, the breeding success of T pairs was largely reduced compared with that of C pairs. The absence of differential allocation in a system in which it could have an adaptive role raises the question about the possible constraints or overriding factors operating on patterns of reproductive investment in this species.
Key words: badge size, reproductive investment, sexual selection, testosterone.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Z. Lendvai, Z. Barta, and O. Chastel Conflict over parental care in house sparrows: do females use a negotiation rule? Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 651 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. E. Harris and T. Uller Reproductive investment when mate quality varies: differential allocation versus reproductive compensation Phil Trans R Soc B, April 27, 2009; 364(1520): 1039 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Kingma, J. Komdeur, O. Vedder, N. von Engelhardt, P. Korsten, and T. G.G. Groothuis Manipulation of male attractiveness induces rapid changes in avian maternal yolk androgen deposition Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 172 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Moreno-Rueda Yolk androgen deposition as a female tactic to manipulate paternal contribution Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 496 - 498. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K.B Gorman and T.D Williams Correlated evolution of maternally derived yolk testosterone and early developmental traits in passerine birds Biol Lett, December 22, 2005; 1(4): 461 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Michl, J. Torok, P. Peczely, L. Z. Garamszegi, and H. Schwabl Female collared flycatchers adjust yolk testosterone to male age, but not to attractiveness Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 383 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Rutstein, L. Gilbert, P. J. B. Slater, and J. A. Graves Sex-specific patterns of yolk androgen allocation depend on maternal diet in the zebra finch Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 62 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|