Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 3: 347-352
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Cape honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis, police worker-laid eggs despite the absence of relatedness benefits
a Lehrstuhl für Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie, Zoologie II, Biozentrum, Universität Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany b Department of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa c Institut für Zoologie/Molekulare Ökologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Kröllwitzer Str. 44, D-06099 Halle/Saale, Germany d Laboratory of Apiculture and Social Insects, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK
Address correspondence to P. Neumann. E-mail: p.neumann{at}zoologie.uni-halle.de.
In the Cape honeybee, Apis mellifera capensis, workers lay diploid (female) eggs via thelytoky. In other A. mellifera subspecies, workers lay haploid (male) eggs via arrhenotoky. When thelytokous worker reproduction occurs, worker policing has no relatedness benefit because workers are equally related to their sister workers' clonal offspring and their mother queen's female offspring. We studied worker policing in A. m. capensis and in the arrhenotokous African honeybee A. m. scutellata by quantifying the removal rates of worker-laid and queen-laid eggs. Discriminator colonies of both subspecies policed worker-laid eggs of both their own and the other subspecies. The occurrence of worker policing, despite the lack of relatedness benefit, in A. m. capensis strongly suggests that worker reproduction is costly to the colony and that policing is maintained because it enhances colony efficiency. In addition, because both subspecies policed each others eggs, it is probable that the mechanism used in thelytokous A. m. capensis to discriminate between queen-laid and worker-laid eggs is the same as in arrhenotokous A. m. scutellata.
Key words: Apis mellifera, egg removal, honeybee, thelytoky, worker policing, worker reproduction.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. B. Barth, K. Kellner, and J. Heinze The police are not the army: context-dependent aggressiveness in a clonal ant Biol Lett, January 13, 2010; (2010) rsbl.2009.0849v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S van Zweden, M. A Furst, J. Heinze, and P. D'Ettorre Specialization in policing behaviour among workers in the ant Pachycondyla inversa Proc R Soc B, June 7, 2007; 274(1616): 1421 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Beekman and B. P Oldroyd Honeybee workers use cues other than egg viability for policing Biol Lett, June 22, 2005; 1(2): 129 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. W. Pirk, P. Neumann, R. Hepburn, R. F. A. Moritz, and J. Tautz Egg viability and worker policing in honey bees PNAS, June 8, 2004; 101(23): 8649 - 8651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Hartmann, J. Wantia, J. A. Torres, and J. Heinze Worker policing without genetic conflicts in a clonal ant PNAS, October 28, 2003; 100(22): 12836 - 12840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


