Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lissåker, M.
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lissåker, M.
Right arrow Articles by Svensson, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 3: 374-381
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Effects of a low oxygen environment on parental effort and filial cannibalism in the male sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus

Maria Lissåker, Charlotta Kvarnemo and Ola Svensson

Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

Address correspondence to M. Lissker. E-mail: maria.lissaker{at}zoologi.su.se.

In fish, brood cycling parental males sometimes eat some or all of their eggs, a behavior termed filial cannibalism. We tested predictions of filial cannibalism models related to the cost of parental care in the male sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, by increasing the parental effort (fanning expenditure) through reduced levels of dissolved oxygen to 39% in an experimental group, whereas a control group had fully saturated water. Males showed both full-clutch cannibalism and partial-clutch cannibalism in both treatments. Giving the males one to three females to spawn with, we found that small clutches were completely eaten more often than were larger ones, whereas partial-clutch cannibalism was not affected by clutch size. Although treatment did not affect filial cannibalism, it did affect a male's energy state such that males in the low oxygen treatment lost more body fat, indicating a greater fanning effort. This shows that males in the low oxygen treatment allocated more energy to the present brood, potentially at the expense of future reproductive success. Our study strongly suggests that filial cannibalism in male sand gobies represents a strategic life-history decision as an investment in future reproductive success, and is not triggered by a proximate need for food necessary for the male's own survival. Furthermore, males in the low oxygen treatment built nests with larger entrances, and were less likely to rebuild their nests after destruction. Presumably, this makes fanning easier but the nest more vulnerable to predators, suggesting a trade-off between fanning and nest defense.

Key words: clutch size, dissolved oxygen, fanning, filial cannibalism, nest building, parental effort, Pomatoschistus minutus, reproductive success, sand goby.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
O. Svensson and C. Kvarnemo
Parasitic spawning in sand gobies: an experimental assessment of nest-opening size, sneaker male cues, paternity, and filial cannibalism
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2007; 18(2): 410 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. Kvarnemo
Evolution and maintenance of male care: is increased paternity a neglected benefit of care?
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 144 - 148.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
O. Svensson and C. Kvarnemo
The importance of sperm competition risk and nest appearance for male behavior and female choice in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2005; 16(6): 1042 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.