Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tuttle, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 3: 425-432
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Alternative reproductive strategies in the white-throated sparrow: behavioral and genetic evidence

Elaina M. Tuttle

Department of Life Sciences, Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN 47809, USA

Address correspondence to E.M. Tuttle. E-mail: lstuttle{at}scifac.indstate.edu.

Organisms exhibiting genetic polymorphism often also exhibit true alternative life-history strategies in which behavioral tactics are genetically fixed. Such systems are ideal for the study of the evolution of life histories because the consequences of selective episodes can be more easily identified. Here I report an interesting and classic example of a species exhibiting true alternative strategies. Due to a chromosomal inversion, male and female white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis) occur as two distinct morphs, tan or white. Tan and white morphs mate disassortatively, and this mating pattern maintains the polymorphism in relatively equal proportions within the population. In comparison with tan males, white males are more aggressive, frequently intrude into neighboring territories, spend less time guarding their mates, occasionally attempt polygyny, and provide less parental care. White females are also more aggressive and solicit copulation from their mates twice as often as tan females. Multilocus DNA fingerprinting revealed that 31.8% of nestlings and 56.3% of broods from white male–tan female pairs were the result of extrapair fertilizations, whereas only 4.4% of nestlings and 6.3% of broods from tan male–white female pairs contained extrapair offspring. However, 4.4% of the nestlings (12.5% of broods) from tan male–white female pairs were attributable to conspecific brood parasitism, and brood parasitism was not a factor for white male–tan female pairs. For three excluded extrapair offspring, actual paternity was assigned to territorial white males, suggesting that, although white males are not preferred by females in previous mate choice studies, they do attempt to increase their reproductive success by securing additional matings via extrapair copulations. However, by doing so, white males also lose paternity at home. Behavioral and genetic evidence suggest that the two morphs use alternative strategies and that reproductive trade-offs may serve to maintain a competitive equilibrium between the morphs.

Key words: alternative reproductive strategy, extrapair copulations, conspecific brood parasitism, polymorphism, sparrows, Zonotrichia albicollis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. W. Thomas, M. Caceres, J. J. Lowman, C. B. Morehouse, M. E. Short, E. L. Baldwin, D. L. Maney, and C. L. Martin
The Chromosomal Polymorphism Linked to Variation in Social Behavior in the White-Throated Sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) Is a Complex Rearrangement and Suppressor of Recombination
Genetics, July 1, 2008; 179(3): 1455 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
S. R. Pryke
Fiery red heads: female dominance among head color morphs in the Gouldian finch
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.