| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 4: 576-582
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Forcible eviction and prevention of recruitment in the clown anemonefish
Cornell University, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Seeley G. Mudd Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Address correspondence to P. Buston, who is now at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, 735 State Street, Suite 300, Santa Barbara, CA 93101-5504, USA. E-mail: buston{at}nceas.ucsb.edu.
How big an animal group will be depends on how the group's size is regulated and on the costs and benefits of living in the group. To determine which individuals regulate group size of the clown anemonefish, Amphiprion percula, I investigated the strategies involved in the formation, maintenance, and dissolution of its groups. Groups composed of a single breeding pair and of zero to four nonbreeding subordinates occupied individual sea anemones (Heteractis magnifica), which provided the fish with oviposition sites and protection from predators. Group size increased linearly with anemone size. I used the residuals of this relationship as a measure of the degree of saturation of each anemone. Residents evicted low-rank subordinates and prevented the recruitment of additional subordinates at anemones with a high degree of saturation, but not at anemones with a low degree of saturation. These strategies indicate that residents control group membership of their subordinates, and suggest that residents might incur costs from the presence of subordinates in more saturated anemones. In general, whenever residents can control group membership, the prevention of recruitment and the eviction of subordinates will set an upper limit on group size.
Key words: density dependence, group size, habitat saturation, habitat selection, migration, settlement.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Field and M. A. Cant Social stability and helping in small animal societies Phil Trans R Soc B, November 12, 2009; 364(1533): 3181 - 3189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Buston and A. G. Zink Reproductive skew and the evolution of conflict resolution: a synthesis of transactional and tug-of-war models Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2009; 20(3): 672 - 684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wall and J. Herler Postsettlement movement patterns and homing in a coral-associated fish Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2009; 20(1): 87 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Griesser, M. Nystrand, S. Eggers, and J. Ekman Social constraints limit dispersal and settlement decisions in a group-living bird species Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2008; 19(2): 317 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Beauchamp and E. Fernandez-Juricic The group-size paradox: effects of learning and patch departure rules Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 352 - 357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

