Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neff, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Neff, B. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gross, M. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Behavioral Ecology Vol. 14 No. 5: 634-641
© 2003 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Sperm investment and alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus)

Bryan D. Neffa,, Peng Fub and Mart R. Grossb

a Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada b Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G5, Canada

Address correspondence to B.D. Neff. E-mail: bneff{at}uwo.ca.

Although alternative mating tactics are found in males of many species, little is known about tactic-specific adaptations to sperm competition and the mechanism by which fertilization success is obtained. We now report on the sperm investment patterns of males that use alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Bluegill males are characterized by three alternative mating tactics: parentals, sneakers, and satellites. Parentals delay maturation and adopt a courting and guarding tactic, whereas sneakers and satellites mature precociously and, respectively, use sneaking and female mimicry to steal fertilizations from parentals. We found differences among the tactics in testes weight, sperm longevity, and ejaculate sperm density and competitiveness. Parentals had the largest testes, but the smallest relative to their body weight. Satellites had intermediate-sized testes, and sneakers had the smallest testes, but the largest relative to their body weight. Within each tactic, there was a positive relationship between testes weight and body weight, but the exact relationship differed among the tactics and could not be attributed solely to allometry. Parentals had longer-lived sperm compared with that of both sneakers and satellites. Ejaculate sperm density was greatest in sneakers, satellites were intermediate, and parentals had the lowest. Competition experiments involving equal volumes of ejaculate showed that fertilization success increased linearly with sperm number, consistent with a rafflelike process. However, independent of sperm number, parental sperm were superior at fertilizing eggs. We interpret these sperm investment patterns in relation to differences in sperm competition risk, number of mating opportunities, and alternative investment options.

Key words: bluegill, fish, sperm competition, strategies, tactics.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
A. Bretman, C. Fricke, and T. Chapman
Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness
Proc R Soc B, May 7, 2009; 276(1662): 1705 - 1711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. A. Vaughn, J. delBarco-Trillo, and M. H. Ferkin
Sperm investment in male meadow voles is affected by the condition of the nearby male conspecifics
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2008; 19(6): 1159 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. J. Crean and D. J. Marshall
Gamete plasticity in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate
PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13508 - 13513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. D. Kelly
Sperm investment in relation to weapon size in a male trimorphic insect?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2008; 19(5): 1018 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.L. Fitzpatrick, J.K. Desjardins, N. Milligan, R. Montgomerie, and S. Balshine
Reproductive-Tactic-Specific Variation in Sperm Swimming Speeds in a Shell-Brooding Cichlid
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 280 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
C. M House, J. Hunt, and A. J Moore
Sperm competition, alternative mating tactics and context-dependent fertilization success in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides
Proc R Soc B, May 22, 2007; 274(1615): 1309 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
T. Pizzari, C. K Cornwallis, and D. P Froman
Social competitiveness associated with rapid fluctuations in sperm quality in male fowl
Proc R Soc B, March 22, 2007; 274(1611): 853 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc R Soc BHome page
G. Rudolfsen, L. Figenschou, I. Folstad, H. Tveiten, and M. Figenschou
Rapid adjustments of sperm characteristics in relation to social status
Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2006; 273(1584): 325 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
P. G. Byrne
Male sperm expenditure under sperm competition risk and intensity in quacking frogs
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 857 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. D. Neff
From the Cover: Stabilizing selection on genomic divergence in a wild fish population
PNAS, February 24, 2004; 101(8): 2381 - 2385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.